Court Rules
All enforcement actions
SettlementMedium Risk

Colorado AG Settlement with Corporate Certificates, LLC and FL UCC Statement Service, LLC over deceptive government-invoice-style business solicitations

Corporate Certificates, LLC and FL UCC Statement Service, LLCSeptember 16, 2026Colorado Attorney General

Penalty Amount

$150,000

Summary

Colorado Attorney General Phil Weiser announced a settlement with Corporate Certificates, LLC and FL UCC Statement Service, LLC resolving allegations that the companies mailed marketing materials to Colorado businesses designed to look like official government invoices, without the statutorily required disclaimers and with purported deadlines implying a legal duty. Under the stipulated consent judgment, the companies will pay $150,000 in refunds and fees and permanently cease all operations in Colorado. The companies had ignored prior warning notices and stopped operating in Colorado in August 2025 after the AG obtained a preliminary injunction.

Remedy

Under the stipulated consent judgment, the companies must pay $150,000 in refunds and fees to the state and permanently cease all operations in Colorado. The companies had already halted Colorado operations in August 2025 due to the Attorney General's motion for preliminary injunction, following warning notices sent in May and December 2024.

Monetary PenaltyConsumer RefundsInjunctionBanConsent Decree

Contract Impact

In-house legal teams should review agreements with marketing vendors, direct-mail agencies, and third-party business compliance/filing service providers (registered agents, annual report filers, UCC retrieval services) for clauses governing solicitation and advertising materials. Contracts should require vendors to comply with state solicitation disclosure laws, including Colorado's requirement for a clear 24-point font disclaimer stating the offer is not from a government agency, and should expressly prohibit the use of deadlines or formatting that imply a legal duty or mimic official government correspondence. Teams should also confirm contracts include representations and warranties of marketing-law compliance, indemnification for consumer protection violations, audit rights over mailed materials, and termination rights for deceptive solicitation practices. Additionally, accounts-payable procedures should be checked so that purported government invoices received from vendors are verified against the secretary of state's official records before payment.

Contract Search Terms

solicitation disclaimergovernment agency disclaimer24-point font disclaimerfiling service advertisementsecretary of state filingUCC filing serviceannual report filing servicedeceptive marketingfalse deadlineinvoice-style solicitation

Laws Cited

Colorado law governing solicitations for secretary of state business filing servicesColorado state law requiring disclaimers on filing-service marketing materials

Violation Types

Entity Details

Entity

Corporate Certificates, LLC and FL UCC Statement Service, LLC

Industry

Other

Official Sources

Source Evidence

Entity Name
"a settlement with Corporate Certificates, LLC, and FL UCC Statement Service, LLC"
Event Date
"Sept. 16, 2026 (DENVER) – Attorney General Phil Weiser today announced a settlement"
Fine Amount
"the companies will pay $150,000 in refunds and fees"
Violation Types
"mailed marketing materials to Colorado businesses that appeared to be official invoices from a government entity, but lacked required disclaimers and included purported deadlines in violation of state law"
Laws Cited
"Colorado law allows businesses to market some periodic report filing services and certificate of good standing retrieval services, it requires marketing materials to have clear disclaimers in at least 24-point font"
Remedy Types
"will permanently cease all operations in Colorado"

Related Enforcement Actions

CO

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration

Colorado joined a coalition of states and local governments in suing the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration over its rule weakening fuel economy standards for new passenger cars and light trucks. The coalition alleges the rule violates federal law; the press release does not report a penalty or a court ruling.

CO

United States Environmental Protection Agency

Colorado Attorney General Phil Weiser joined a multistate and local coalition challenging the EPA’s repeal of greenhouse gas limits for many coal- and gas-fired power plants. The coalition seeks to have the repeal struck down and the protections restored, and separately notified the EPA of its intent to sue over regulation of emissions from existing gas plants; no penalty or final court remedy is reported.

CO

Sandoz Inc. and Fougera Pharmaceuticals Inc.

$469.0M

Colorado joined a 43-state-and-territory settlement resolving allegations that Sandoz and Fougera participated in a long-running conspiracy to inflate generic drug prices, reduce competition, and restrain trade. The companies agreed to pay approximately $469 million and implement reforms; the states are seeking court approval.

CO

Corteva, Inc.

$35.0M

Colorado, the FTC, and a coalition of state attorneys general reached a settlement with Corteva over allegations that its post-patent loyalty program restricted distributors from selling competing generic pesticides. Corteva must end the challenged conduct and pay the states $35 million for fees and costs; the agreement is in effect for 10 years.

CO

Laboratory Corporation of America

$2.3M

Colorado and a bipartisan coalition of attorneys general reached a $2,287,455 settlement with Laboratory Corporation of America over the 2019 data breach at its debt collector, American Medical Collection Agency. The settlement requires stronger vendor risk management and information security practices, with particular requirements for medical debt collectors.

CO

Paramount Skydance Corporation

Colorado Attorney General Phil Weiser joined a coalition of 12 attorneys general in settling a lawsuit against Paramount Skydance Corporation over its merger with Warner Bros. Discovery, which the states alleged would harm competition by lowering film output and raising prices. The settlement includes a five-year commitment to increase film output, a $1.5 billion investment in domestic production, a $47.5 million worker fund, and an independent monitor. This is an antitrust/competition enforcement action, not a privacy enforcement action, despite the extraction schema's privacy focus.