Court Rules
All enforcement actions
SettlementLow Risk

Colorado AG settlement with Sares Regis Group over source-of-income (housing voucher) discrimination

Sares Regis GroupSeptember 17, 2026Colorado Attorney General

Penalty Amount

$30,000

Summary

Colorado Attorney General Phil Weiser announced a settlement with Sares Regis Group, a Denver-metro property management company, after an investigation found it told prospective tenants that rental subsidies and housing vouchers were not accepted at its properties, in violation of the Colorado Anti-Discrimination Act and the Colorado Consumer Protection Act. Under the settlement, the company must adopt written source-of-income policies, train leasing employees, submit a compliance report to the AG's office, and refrain from misrepresenting its voucher acceptance, and it pays $30,000 to the Housing Rights Initiative. Note: this is a fair-housing enforcement action, not a privacy matter, so no privacy violation taxonomy categories apply.

Remedy

Sares Regis Group must comply with all state and federal housing laws including source-of-income nondiscrimination, adopt and implement written policies ensuring acceptance of lawful sources of income including housing vouchers, train employees involved in leasing and tenant communications on fair housing requirements, and provide a compliance report to the attorney general's office detailing its policies and whether it is renting to tenants using rental assistance. The agreement also prohibits the company from misrepresenting whether it accepts housing vouchers or other lawful sources of income in the future, and it must pay $30,000 to the Housing Rights Initiative to support fair housing enforcement and education efforts.

Monetary PenaltyInjunctionConsent DecreeCompliance ProgramReporting Requirements

Contract Impact

Although this is a fair-housing enforcement action rather than a privacy matter, in-house teams overseeing property management or real estate operations should review property management agreements, leasing vendor and marketing/advertising contracts, and employee training policies for source-of-income nondiscrimination language. Check compliance-with-law clauses requiring adherence to the Colorado Anti-Discrimination Act and federal fair housing laws; verify that tenant qualification criteria, leasing scripts, and third-party leasing agent instructions do not exclude Housing Choice Vouchers or Section 8; and confirm agreements obligate staff training and periodic compliance reporting on voucher acceptance. Standard privacy contract clauses (data processing, breach notification, opt-out mechanisms) are not implicated here, but representations-and-warranties regarding regulatory compliance in property management and leasing agreements should be updated to expressly cover lawful-source-of-income obligations and accurate communications with prospective tenants.

Contract Search Terms

source of incomehousing voucherSection 8rental assistancetenant screening criteriafair housingleasing policiesanti-discriminationcompliance report

Laws Cited

Colorado Anti-Discrimination ActColorado Consumer Protection Act

Violation Types

Entity Details

Entity

Sares Regis Group

Industry

Real Estate

Official Sources

Source Evidence

Entity Name
"settlement with Sares Regis Group, a property management company operating in the Denver metro area"
Event Date
"Sept. 17, 2026"
Fine Amount
"Pay $30,000 to the Housing Rights Initiative to support fair housing enforcement and education efforts."
Laws Cited
"violated the Colorado Anti-Discrimination Act and the Colorado Consumer Protection Act"
Summary
"the company discriminated against prospective tenants by refusing to accept housing vouchers, including Section 8"
Remedy Types
"Adopt and implement written policies to ensure acceptance of lawful sources of income, including housing vouchers."

Related Enforcement Actions

CO

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration

Colorado joined a coalition of states and local governments in suing the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration over its rule weakening fuel economy standards for new passenger cars and light trucks. The coalition alleges the rule violates federal law; the press release does not report a penalty or a court ruling.

CO

United States Environmental Protection Agency

Colorado Attorney General Phil Weiser joined a multistate and local coalition challenging the EPA’s repeal of greenhouse gas limits for many coal- and gas-fired power plants. The coalition seeks to have the repeal struck down and the protections restored, and separately notified the EPA of its intent to sue over regulation of emissions from existing gas plants; no penalty or final court remedy is reported.

CO

Sandoz Inc. and Fougera Pharmaceuticals Inc.

$469.0M

Colorado joined a 43-state-and-territory settlement resolving allegations that Sandoz and Fougera participated in a long-running conspiracy to inflate generic drug prices, reduce competition, and restrain trade. The companies agreed to pay approximately $469 million and implement reforms; the states are seeking court approval.

CO

Corteva, Inc.

$35.0M

Colorado, the FTC, and a coalition of state attorneys general reached a settlement with Corteva over allegations that its post-patent loyalty program restricted distributors from selling competing generic pesticides. Corteva must end the challenged conduct and pay the states $35 million for fees and costs; the agreement is in effect for 10 years.

CO

Laboratory Corporation of America

$2.3M

Colorado and a bipartisan coalition of attorneys general reached a $2,287,455 settlement with Laboratory Corporation of America over the 2019 data breach at its debt collector, American Medical Collection Agency. The settlement requires stronger vendor risk management and information security practices, with particular requirements for medical debt collectors.

CO

Paramount Skydance Corporation

Colorado Attorney General Phil Weiser joined a coalition of 12 attorneys general in settling a lawsuit against Paramount Skydance Corporation over its merger with Warner Bros. Discovery, which the states alleged would harm competition by lowering film output and raising prices. The settlement includes a five-year commitment to increase film output, a $1.5 billion investment in domestic production, a $47.5 million worker fund, and an independent monitor. This is an antitrust/competition enforcement action, not a privacy enforcement action, despite the extraction schema's privacy focus.