Court Rules
All enforcement actions
CoalitionLow RiskMultistate

Connecticut AG Joins Coalition Opposing DHS Asylum Rule

U.S. Department of Homeland SecuritySeptember 30, 2026Connecticut Attorney General

Summary

Connecticut Attorney General William Tong joined a coalition of 21 attorneys general in submitting a comment letter opposing a DHS rule that allows certain affirmative asylum applications to be referred to removal proceedings without an asylum officer interview. The coalition argues the rule violates federal law and harms asylum seekers, including unaccompanied children; this was a policy opposition letter, not a privacy enforcement action.

Contract Impact

This release concerns immigration policy rather than privacy or a contract enforcement action, so it does not identify specific contract clauses requiring revision. Organizations contracting with immigration-service providers, legal aid organizations, or vendors supporting asylum cases may nonetheless want to review service descriptions and referral procedures, safeguards for unaccompanied minors, notice and change-in-law provisions, and confidentiality and data-handling terms for applicant information.

Contract Search Terms

immigration-services vendor obligationsasylum applicant interview proceduresunaccompanied minor safeguardslegal services referral requirementsgovernment rule change noticeimmigration case data handling

Laws Cited

Administrative Procedure ActTrafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act

Violation Types

Entity Details

Entity

U.S. Department of Homeland Security

Industry

Other

Multistate Coalition

CaliforniaColoradoDelawareDistrict of ColumbiaHawai‘iIllinoisMaineMarylandMassachusettsMichiganMinnesotaNevadaNew JerseyNew MexicoNew YorkOregonRhode IslandVermontVirginiaWashington

Official Sources

Source Evidence

Entity Name
"opposing the U.S. Department of Homeland Security’s (DHS) new rule"
Laws Cited
"under the Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act"
Laws Cited
"Abandons compliance with the Administrative Procedure Act (APA)"
Violation description
"the coalition argue the IFR violates federal law"
Is Multistate
"as part of a coalition of 21 attorneys general"

Related Enforcement Actions

VA

U.S. Department of Homeland Security

Attorney General Jay Jones joined a coalition of 26 states to sue the Trump administration over unlawful conditions attached to counterterrorism and emergency funding. The conditions would require states to share voter data with DHS and assist in immigration enforcement, which the coalition argues violates the Administrative Procedure Act and the Spending Clause.

OR

U.S. Department of Homeland Security

Other enforcement action: Oregon Attorney General Dan Rayfield, joined by 18 other states, sued the Trump Administration over its unlawful $100,000 fee for H-1B visa petitions. The lawsuit alleges that the policy violates the Administrative Procedure Act by exceeding congressional authority and bypassing required rulemaking procedures, harming educational institutions and employers.

CA

U.S. Department of Homeland Security

California Attorney General Rob Bonta co-led a coalition of 18 attorneys general in submitting a comment letter opposing the Department of Homeland Security's expansion of the Systematic Alien Verification for Entitlements (SAVE) program to include U.S.-born citizens. The coalition argues the expansion violates the Privacy Act of 1974, creates a massive surveillance database, increases data breach risks, and will lead to inaccurate verifications and denial of benefits.

CT

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration

Connecticut Attorney General William Tong joined a coalition of states and local governments in filing suit against NHTSA over its rule weakening fuel economy standards for new passenger cars and light trucks. The lawsuit alleges the rule violates the agency’s statutory mandate and the Administrative Procedure Act; no penalty or final remedy is reported.

CT

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

Connecticut Attorney General William Tong joined a multistate coalition suing the EPA over its repeal of greenhouse gas pollution limits for power plants and separately filed a notice of intent to sue over regulation of existing gas plants. The coalition asks the court to overturn the repeal and restore the protections; the release reports no monetary penalty or final order.

CT

Sandoz Inc. and Fougera Pharmaceuticals Inc.

$400.0M

Connecticut Attorney General William Tong announced a $400 million settlement with Sandoz Inc. and Fougera Pharmaceuticals Inc. resolving allegations that the generic drug manufacturers conspired to inflate prices, limit competition, and restrain trade. The settlement includes consumer restitution and injunctive reforms; court approval was being sought.