FTC staff published FAQs on price transparency to help the automobile industry comply with the FTC Act, reiterating that an advertised vehicle price must be the actual price any consumer can pay, excluding only government-required charges. The guidance follows warning letters the FTC sent to 97 auto dealership groups earlier in 2026 and signals continued litigation against dealers that advertise one price but charge more through undisclosed fees. No specific entity was charged and no penalty was imposed.
None. This is non-binding staff guidance and no remedies were imposed on any entity. The FTC separately noted it sent warning letters to 97 auto dealership groups earlier in 2026, continues to bring lawsuits against dealers engaged in deceptive pricing, and encourages the public and dealers to report potential violations at ReportFraud.ftc.gov.
Although no entity was named, in-house counsel at dealerships, advertising agencies, and online vehicle listing/lead-generation platforms should audit advertising agency agreements, website and listing-platform vendor contracts, and F&I add-on product contracts to ensure pricing representations align with the FTC's price transparency FAQs. Key clauses to review include: representations and warranties that all advertised prices include every mandatory fee (e.g., document/prep fees) and exclude only government-required charges; compliance obligations requiring third-party ad creative, price feeds, and inventory listings to disclose total pricing consistent with FTC Act Section 5; approval and update workflows for price changes (including vehicles in transit); rebate and discount disclosure standards; and alignment between the advertised price and the final consumer contract so customers are never charged above the advertised amount. Where vendor systems control displayed pricing, teams should add audit rights, compliance certifications, and indemnification for deceptive-pricing claims.
Entity
Automobile industry (auto dealers) - no named respondent; industry-wide guidance publication
Industry
AutomotiveOfficial Press Release
https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/news/press-releases/2026/09/ftc-publishes-price-transparency-faqs-auto-dealers
automobile industry pricing transparency faqs
https://www.ftc.gov/business-guidance/resources/automobile-industry-pricing-transparency-faqs
ftc warns 97 auto dealership groups about deceptive pricing
https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/news/press-releases/2026/03/ftc-warns-97-auto-dealership-groups-about-deceptive-pricing
Federal Trade Commission Enforcement Page
https://www.ftc.gov/enforcement
"FTC Publishes Price Transparency FAQs for Auto Dealers"
"September 15, 2026"
"Staff of the Federal Trade Commission today published"
"guidance is intended to help dealers and others in the auto industry better understand how the law applies to their advertising"
"to help the automobile industry comply with the FTC Act"
"The FTC Act requires truthful and accurate pricing"
The FTC, Utah, and Nevada sued Lens.com Inc., alleging that it advertised artificially low contact lens prices while hiding mandatory checkout charges and misleading consumers about its AutoRefill subscription. The complaint seeks to stop the alleged practices; the court has not yet decided the case, and no penalty or remedy has been imposed.
The FTC issued an advance notice of proposed rulemaking seeking public comment on whether ad-optimization tools offered by online platforms may help scammers impersonate businesses and government agencies. This is a proposed regulatory inquiry, not an enforcement action against a named company; no penalty or remedy was imposed.
$2.5B
A federal court approved a revised order in the FTC's Amazon Prime case under which Amazon will accelerate and expand redress payments under the September 2025 $2.5 billion settlement, which resolved allegations that Amazon enrolled millions of consumers in Prime subscriptions without their consent and knowingly made cancellation difficult. More consumers now qualify for refunds, the maximum payment cap rises from $51 to $200, and all future payments will be distributed automatically starting October 1, 2026, with potential supplemental $149 payments by April 2027. Amazon has already issued more than $845 million in redress payments as of September 2026.
$225.0M
The FTC and the state of Washington filed a joint complaint and proposed stipulated order requiring Amway Corp. and two affiliates—World Wide Group, L.L.C. (WWG) and Leadership Team Development Inc. (LTD)—to pay a $225 million judgment, the largest monetary recovery ever obtained from an MLM in an FTC action, over allegations that they used deceptive earnings claims and unfair tactics to recruit Independent Business Owners. The complaint alleges the companies falsely promised substantial income and recruitment success, pressured IBOs to buy products they could not resell, and instructed IBOs to falsely report sales. Nearly all of the judgment will be used as redress for IBOs who lost money, and the proposed order imposes structural reforms including a 70% resale requirement, independent audits of sales records, and a ban on approved providers charging new IBOs for first-year training.
$100.0M
FleetCor Technologies Inc. (now Corpay Inc.) and its CEO Ronald Clarke agreed to pay $100 million to settle an FTC administrative action alleging the company charged small business customers hidden and unauthorized fees for fuel cards and misrepresented gas savings, fraud-control features, and fees. A federal district court granted the FTC summary judgment on all counts in 2023, and a federal appeals court upheld that judgment and the permanent injunction in 2026. The settlement funds will be used to provide redress to harmed business customers.
The FTC rescinded its 2021 Policy Statement on Breaches by Health Apps and Other Connected Devices, which had purported to apply the Health Breach Notification Rule to health apps and connected devices that collect consumer health information. The rescission follows the Commission's 2024 update to the Health Breach Notification Rule, which already covers health apps and connected devices like fitness trackers, and implements an executive order directing agencies to eliminate obsolete guidance documents. No company was charged or penalized; this is a deregulatory action.