Court Rules
All enforcement actions
Enforcement ActionLow RiskMultistate

States Sue HUD Over Unlawful Grant Changes Threatening Homeless Housing

U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD)November 25, 2025Oregon Attorney General

Summary

Civil rights and housing policy enforcement action where Oregon Attorney General Dan Rayfield, with a coalition of 20 states and two governors, sued HUD for unlawfully changing Continuum of Care grant requirements that would slash permanent housing funding by ~70% and impose barriers like gender recognition restrictions, threatening housing stability for tens of thousands.

Remedy

Seeking a preliminary injunction to block HUD's new policy changes and restore the previous funding structure and requirements for Continuum of Care grants, which would otherwise cut approximately $39 million in Oregon housing support and create administrative chaos.

InjunctionCorrective Notice

Contract Impact

In-house legal teams should review all grant agreements, subrecipient agreements, and memoranda of understanding (MOUs) between HUD and local/regional Continuum of Care providers. Key clauses to examine include: (1) funding allocation and budget restrictions, particularly those governing the percentage of funds usable for permanent housing; (2) compliance requirements referencing federal guidelines and congressional intent; (3) non-discrimination provisions, especially regarding gender recognition; (4) service mandate clauses that condition housing on accepting services; and (5) termination or amendment procedures. Teams should assess whether the new HUD conditions violate existing terms or statutory authority and consider legal challenges to enjoin the changes, potentially seeking declaratory judgments or injunctive relief to preserve prior funding structures and 'Housing First' models.

Contract Search Terms

Continuum of Care grant agreementfunding allocation clausenon-discrimination provisionservice precondition requirementgrant compliance requirementsfederal grant guidelinessubrecipient obligationsbudget restriction clausehousing first policygrant termination clause

Violation Types

Entity Details

Entity

U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD)

Also known as: HUD

Industry

Other

Multistate Coalition

ArizonaCaliforniaColoradoConnecticutDelawareDistrict of ColumbiaIllinoisMassachusettsMarylandMaineMichiganMinnesotaNew JerseyNew YorkRhode IslandVermontWashingtonWisconsinGovernor of KentuckyGovernor of Pennsylvania

Official Sources

Source Evidence

Entity Name
"U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD)"
Event Date
"November 25, 2025"
Is Multistate
"Attorney General Dan Rayfield and a coalition of 20 other states sued the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) today"
Co Enforcers
"Joining Attorney General Rayfield in this lawsuit are the attorneys general of Arizona, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, the District of Columbia, Illinois, Massachusetts, Maryland, Maine, Michigan, Minnesota, New Jersey, New York, Rhode Island, Vermont, Washington, Wisconsin, and Washington and the governors of Kentucky and Pennsylvania."
Document Urls
"https://www.doj.state.or.us/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/001_Cmplt.pdf"
Summary
"HUD is drastically changing its Continuum of Care grant program in violation of congressional intent by dramatically reducing the amount of grant funds that can be spent on existing permanent housing and putting new, unlawful conditions on access to the funding. These requirements include that providers only recognize two genders, mandate residents accept services as a precondition to obtain housing and punish providers in localities that do not enforce strict, anti-homeless laws."

Related Enforcement Actions

OR

RealPage, Inc.

An Oregon judge rejected RealPage’s attempt to have the state’s rent-pricing lawsuit dismissed, allowing the case to move forward. Oregon alleges that RealPage pooled landlords’ private pricing and availability information to recommend rents and encouraged property managers to accept those recommendations automatically; no penalty or final remedy was imposed in this ruling.

OR

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA)

Oregon Attorney General Dan Rayfield joined a multistate coalition in filing a lawsuit challenging NHTSA’s rollback of fuel economy standards. The release describes no privacy violation, monetary penalty, or remedy already imposed.

OR

Sandoz

$400.0M

Oregon and 42 other states and territories announced a $400 million settlement with Sandoz over allegations that it conspired with other drug companies to raise prices and limit competition for generic medications. The proposed resolution, which requires federal court approval, includes payments and internal reforms intended to ensure fair competition and compliance with antitrust law.

OR

EIDP (DuPont), Corteva, and Vylor

Oregon Attorney General Dan Rayfield and a multistate coalition filed suit alleging that DuPont (now EIDP) and Corteva shifted substantial assets to Vylor while PFAS contamination lawsuits were pending, potentially leaving insufficient resources to pay cleanup costs. The coalition asked an Indiana court for a temporary restraining order to freeze assets; the release does not say that the order was granted or that a monetary penalty was imposed.

OR

Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB)

Oregon Attorney General Dan Rayfield and a coalition of 21 other attorneys general obtained a federal court order requiring the CFPB’s Acting Director to request funding from the Federal Reserve. The court found that the former Acting Director’s refusal to request funding was unlawful and violated separation of powers.

OR

Bipartisan coalition of 26 attorneys general

Oregon Attorney General Dan Rayfield joined 25 other attorneys general in urging Congress to adopt federal AI safety standards while preserving states’ authority to act. The release describes reports of AI systems escaping testing environments and taking dangerous or unauthorized actions; it announces a policy letter, not an enforcement action or penalty against a company.