Court Rules
All enforcement actions
Enforcement ActionCritical RiskMultistate

Oregon AG Sues to Block Nexstar-Tegna $6.2B Merger

Nexstar Media Group, Inc. and Tegna Inc.March 19, 2026Oregon Attorney General

Summary

Antitrust enforcement action where Oregon AG filed a lawsuit to block the $6.2 billion merger of Nexstar and Tegna, alleging it violates Clayton Act Section 7 by substantially lessening competition in broadcasting, which could harm local news and raise consumer prices.

Remedy

The lawsuit seeks a permanent injunction to prevent the merger from proceeding.

Injunction

Contract Impact

In-house legal teams should review vendor agreements with advertisers, carriage agreements with cable/satellite providers, and local partnership contracts for change of control clauses, termination rights, exclusivity provisions, and antitrust representations. Specific attention is needed for clauses governing pricing, content quotas, and market exclusivity, as the merger could trigger renegotiation, add market concentration limits, or require adjustments to account for reduced competitive leverage and potential price increases.

Contract Search Terms

change of controltermination feeantitrust compliance clauseexclusive carriage agreementadvertising revenue sharinglocal news production quotamarket concentration thresholdregulatory approval conditionmaterial adverse effectnon-compete provision

Laws Cited

Clayton Act Section 7
15 U.S.C. § 18

Violation Types

Entity Details

Entity

Nexstar Media Group, Inc. and Tegna Inc.

Also known as: Nexstar and Tegna

Industry

Media & Entertainment

Multistate Coalition

Official Sources

Source Evidence

Entity Name
"acquisition of Tegna Inc. (Tegna) by Nexstar Media Group, Inc. (Nexstar)"
Laws Cited
"Section 7 of the Clayton Act"
Violation Types
"mergers that substantially lessen competition or tend to create a monopoly"

Related Enforcement Actions

VA

Nexstar Media Group, Inc. and Tegna Inc.

Virginia Attorney General Jay Jones joined a bipartisan coalition of 13 attorneys general alleging that Nexstar and Tegna are violating a court's hold-separate order by allowing Nexstar personnel to remain on Tegna's Board of Directors during the merger litigation. The coalition seeks clarification of the order to ensure the companies operate independently while the antitrust case proceeds.

CA

Nexstar Media Group, Inc. and Tegna Inc.

California Attorney General Rob Bonta, joined by attorneys general from seven other states, filed a lawsuit to block the $6.2 billion merger between Nexstar Media Group and Tegna Inc. The lawsuit alleges the merger violates Section 7 of the Clayton Act by reducing competition in local TV markets, leading to higher prices, less local news, and job losses.

OR

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA)

Oregon Attorney General Dan Rayfield joined a multistate coalition in filing a lawsuit challenging NHTSA’s rollback of fuel economy standards. The release describes no privacy violation, monetary penalty, or remedy already imposed.

OR

RealPage, Inc.

An Oregon judge rejected RealPage’s attempt to have the state’s rent-pricing lawsuit dismissed, allowing the case to move forward. Oregon alleges that RealPage pooled landlords’ private pricing and availability information to recommend rents and encouraged property managers to accept those recommendations automatically; no penalty or final remedy was imposed in this ruling.

OR

Sandoz

$400.0M

Oregon and 42 other states and territories announced a $400 million settlement with Sandoz over allegations that it conspired with other drug companies to raise prices and limit competition for generic medications. The proposed resolution, which requires federal court approval, includes payments and internal reforms intended to ensure fair competition and compliance with antitrust law.

OR

EIDP (DuPont), Corteva, and Vylor

Oregon Attorney General Dan Rayfield and a multistate coalition filed suit alleging that DuPont (now EIDP) and Corteva shifted substantial assets to Vylor while PFAS contamination lawsuits were pending, potentially leaving insufficient resources to pay cleanup costs. The coalition asked an Indiana court for a temporary restraining order to freeze assets; the release does not say that the order was granted or that a monetary penalty was imposed.