Court Rules
All enforcement actions
InvestigationLow Risk

CT AG Investigates Altice Optimum Over Slow Speeds and Hidden Fees

Altice OptimumNovember 21, 2022Connecticut Attorney General

Consumers Affected

500

Summary

Connecticut Attorney General William Tong announced an investigation into Altice Optimum based on nearly 500 consumer complaints regarding slow internet speeds, hidden fees, and poor customer service. The investigation, launched under the Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices Act, seeks records dating back to January 2017 to determine potential violations. This follows a prior $60 million settlement with Frontier Communications for similar consumer protection issues.

Contract Impact

In-house legal teams should prioritize reviewing all customer-facing service agreements, including residential internet service contracts and terms of service. Specific clauses to scrutinize are: (1) Service Level Agreements (SLAs) and speed guarantee clauses to ensure advertised speeds (e.g., 300/400 Mbps) are contractually guaranteed with clear remedies for failure; (2) Fee disclosure and billing transparency sections to identify and eliminate ambiguous or undisclosed fees like the 'Network Enhancement Fee'; (3) Customer service and technical support commitments, including response time guarantees; and (4) Termination provisions related to service failures. Contracts may need revision to include measurable performance metrics, explicit fee schedules, and clear consumer remedies for non-compliance, aligning with state unfair trade practices standards.

Contract Search Terms

service level agreementspeed guarantee clausefee disclosure provisionbilling transparency clausecustomer service standardstermination for non-performancecomplaint resolution mechanismadvertised speed guarantee

Laws Cited

Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices Act

Violation Types

Entity Details

Entity

Altice Optimum

Industry

Telecommunications

Official Sources

Related Enforcement Actions

CT

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration

Connecticut Attorney General William Tong joined a coalition of states and local governments in filing suit against NHTSA over its rule weakening fuel economy standards for new passenger cars and light trucks. The lawsuit alleges the rule violates the agency’s statutory mandate and the Administrative Procedure Act; no penalty or final remedy is reported.

CT

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

Connecticut Attorney General William Tong joined a multistate coalition suing the EPA over its repeal of greenhouse gas pollution limits for power plants and separately filed a notice of intent to sue over regulation of existing gas plants. The coalition asks the court to overturn the repeal and restore the protections; the release reports no monetary penalty or final order.

CT

Sandoz Inc. and Fougera Pharmaceuticals Inc.

$400.0M

Connecticut Attorney General William Tong announced a $400 million settlement with Sandoz Inc. and Fougera Pharmaceuticals Inc. resolving allegations that the generic drug manufacturers conspired to inflate prices, limit competition, and restrain trade. The settlement includes consumer restitution and injunctive reforms; court approval was being sought.

CT

U.S. Department of Homeland Security

Connecticut Attorney General William Tong joined a coalition of 21 attorneys general in submitting a comment letter opposing a DHS rule that allows certain affirmative asylum applications to be referred to removal proceedings without an asylum officer interview. The coalition argues the rule violates federal law and harms asylum seekers, including unaccompanied children; this was a policy opposition letter, not a privacy enforcement action.

CT

NextEra Energy and Dominion Energy

Connecticut and Massachusetts co-led a coalition protest urging FERC to reject the proposed NextEra Energy-Dominion Energy merger. The coalition argued that the merger could increase market power and threaten energy affordability, reliability, and competition; the release does not report a final enforcement decision or penalty.

CT

Unspecified home improvement contractors

Connecticut officials warned residents about potential home improvement scams before an approaching nor’easter, including unlicensed contractors, high-pressure sales tactics, and demands for full payment upfront. The release provides consumer guidance on checking contractors and contract requirements; it does not announce an enforcement action or penalty against a named entity.