Court Rules
All enforcement actions
SettlementCritical RiskMultistate

CT AG Leads $39.1M Antitrust Settlement with Apotex Over Generic Drug Price-Fixing

ApotexMarch 26, 2025Connecticut Attorney General

Penalty Amount

$39,100,000

Summary

Connecticut Attorney General William Tong leads a multistate coalition in a $39.1 million settlement with Apotex for conspiracy to inflate generic drug prices and limit competition. The settlement resolves allegations of widespread price-fixing and requires Apotex to pay compensation to affected consumers, agree to injunctive relief, and implement internal reforms to ensure antitrust compliance.

Remedy

Apotex must pay $39.1 million, agree to injunctive relief to prevent future misconduct, and implement internal reforms to ensure fair competition and compliance with antitrust laws.

Monetary PenaltyInjunctionCompliance Program

Contract Impact

In-house legal teams should review vendor agreements for antitrust compliance clauses, ensuring prohibitions on price fixing, market allocation, and other anti-competitive practices. Contracts should include representations and warranties regarding compliance with antitrust laws, audit rights for monitoring, and clear remedies for breaches such as termination or indemnification.

Contract Search Terms

antitrust complianceprice fixingmarket allocationno-poach agreementscompetition lawgeneric drug pricingcollusiontrade restraintfair competitioncompliance audit

Violation Types

Entity Details

Entity

Apotex

Industry

Healthcare

Multistate Coalition

AlaskaArizonaCaliforniaColoradoDelawareDistrict of ColumbiaFloridaGeorgiaIdahoIllinoisIndianaIowaKansasKentuckyLouisianaMaineMarylandMassachusettsMichiganMinnesotaMississippiMissouriMontanaNebraskaNevadaNew HampshireNew JerseyNew MexicoNew YorkNorth CarolinaNorth DakotaNorthern Mariana IslandsOhioOklahomaOregonPennsylvaniaRhode IslandSouth CarolinaSouth DakotaTennesseeUtahU.S. Virgin IslandsVermontVirginiaWashingtonWest VirginiaWisconsinWyomingPuerto Rico

Official Sources

Source Evidence

Entity Name
"Apotex"
Fine Amount
"$39.1 million"
Violation Types
"conspiracy to inflate prices and limit competition"

Related Enforcement Actions

CT

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration

Connecticut Attorney General William Tong joined a coalition of states and local governments in filing suit against NHTSA over its rule weakening fuel economy standards for new passenger cars and light trucks. The lawsuit alleges the rule violates the agency’s statutory mandate and the Administrative Procedure Act; no penalty or final remedy is reported.

CT

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

Connecticut Attorney General William Tong joined a multistate coalition suing the EPA over its repeal of greenhouse gas pollution limits for power plants and separately filed a notice of intent to sue over regulation of existing gas plants. The coalition asks the court to overturn the repeal and restore the protections; the release reports no monetary penalty or final order.

CT

Sandoz Inc. and Fougera Pharmaceuticals Inc.

$400.0M

Connecticut Attorney General William Tong announced a $400 million settlement with Sandoz Inc. and Fougera Pharmaceuticals Inc. resolving allegations that the generic drug manufacturers conspired to inflate prices, limit competition, and restrain trade. The settlement includes consumer restitution and injunctive reforms; court approval was being sought.

CT

U.S. Department of Homeland Security

Connecticut Attorney General William Tong joined a coalition of 21 attorneys general in submitting a comment letter opposing a DHS rule that allows certain affirmative asylum applications to be referred to removal proceedings without an asylum officer interview. The coalition argues the rule violates federal law and harms asylum seekers, including unaccompanied children; this was a policy opposition letter, not a privacy enforcement action.

CT

NextEra Energy and Dominion Energy

Connecticut and Massachusetts co-led a coalition protest urging FERC to reject the proposed NextEra Energy-Dominion Energy merger. The coalition argued that the merger could increase market power and threaten energy affordability, reliability, and competition; the release does not report a final enforcement decision or penalty.

CT

Unspecified home improvement contractors

Connecticut officials warned residents about potential home improvement scams before an approaching nor’easter, including unlicensed contractors, high-pressure sales tactics, and demands for full payment upfront. The release provides consumer guidance on checking contractors and contract requirements; it does not announce an enforcement action or penalty against a named entity.