Court Rules
All enforcement actions
CoalitionLow RiskMultistate

CT AG Tong Joins Multistate Coalition Opposing Digital Asset Market Clarity Act to Preserve State Crypto Fraud Enforcement Authority

Digital Asset Market Clarity Act (proposed federal legislation — no enforcement target entity)September 14, 2026Connecticut Attorney General

Summary

Connecticut Attorney General William Tong joined a bipartisan coalition of 16 other state attorneys general in sending a letter to the U.S. Senate Banking Committee opposing the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act, warning it would preempt state authority to protect investors from cryptocurrency fraud and scams. The coalition urges Congress to preserve state enforcement, registration, and federal-state cooperation roles over digital assets. This is a legislative advocacy action, not an enforcement action — no entity was charged, no violations were found, and no penalty was imposed.

Remedy

No remedies imposed. The press release announces a multistate advocacy letter to Congress opposing proposed legislation; the coalition asks Congress to preserve state enforcement roles for tokenized and non-tokenized securities, preserve federal-state cooperation, codify state crypto registration regimes, and clarify ambiguous language in the bill.

Contract Impact

This is a legislative advocacy action rather than an enforcement action, so it imposes no direct contractual obligations today. However, if the Clarity Act advances, in-house teams at companies with digital-asset exposure — including payment processors, custody providers, exchanges, and investment platforms — should review change-in-law and regulatory-compliance clauses in vendor and customer agreements to address potential SEC preemption of state registration regimes, representations and warranties regarding the legal classification of digital assets as securities, state licensing and registration obligations for crypto platforms, and allocation of liability for fraud or investor-protection compliance failures. Organizations operating in states that signed the letter (CA, NY, NJ, MA, WA, and others) should anticipate continued aggressive state-level crypto enforcement and ensure vendor agreements include cooperation clauses for state AG inquiries and indemnification for regulatory actions arising from digital-asset services.

Contract Search Terms

digital assetcryptocurrency platformstate registration requirementSEC preemptionchange in law clausesecurities classificationregulatory compliance representationcrypto services agreementinvestor protection

Laws Cited

Digital Asset Market Clarity Act (Clarity Act)

Violation Types

Entity Details

Entity

Digital Asset Market Clarity Act (proposed federal legislation — no enforcement target entity)

Industry

Other

Multistate Coalition

Arizona AGCalifornia AGDelaware AGIllinois AGKansas AGMaryland AGMassachusetts AGMichigan AGMinnesota AGNew Jersey AGNew York AGNevada AGOhio AGVirginia AGWashington AGWisconsin AGDistrict of Columbia AG

Official Sources

Source Evidence

Title
"Attorney General Tong Calls on Congress to Preserve States’ Ability to Protect Americans from Cryptocurrency Scams"
Event Date
"09/14/2026"
Event Type
"Attorney General William Tong today joined a bipartisan coalition of 16 other attorneys general in opposing the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act (Clarity Act)"
Entity Name
"the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act (Clarity Act)"
Laws Cited
"opposing the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act (Clarity Act)"
Summary
"The attorneys general caution that as written, the Clarity Act would prevent states from serving as the first line of defense against the escalating epidemic of cryptocurrency fraud."

Related Enforcement Actions

CT

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration

Connecticut Attorney General William Tong joined a coalition of states and local governments in filing suit against NHTSA over its rule weakening fuel economy standards for new passenger cars and light trucks. The lawsuit alleges the rule violates the agency’s statutory mandate and the Administrative Procedure Act; no penalty or final remedy is reported.

CT

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

Connecticut Attorney General William Tong joined a multistate coalition suing the EPA over its repeal of greenhouse gas pollution limits for power plants and separately filed a notice of intent to sue over regulation of existing gas plants. The coalition asks the court to overturn the repeal and restore the protections; the release reports no monetary penalty or final order.

CT

Sandoz Inc. and Fougera Pharmaceuticals Inc.

$400.0M

Connecticut Attorney General William Tong announced a $400 million settlement with Sandoz Inc. and Fougera Pharmaceuticals Inc. resolving allegations that the generic drug manufacturers conspired to inflate prices, limit competition, and restrain trade. The settlement includes consumer restitution and injunctive reforms; court approval was being sought.

CT

U.S. Department of Homeland Security

Connecticut Attorney General William Tong joined a coalition of 21 attorneys general in submitting a comment letter opposing a DHS rule that allows certain affirmative asylum applications to be referred to removal proceedings without an asylum officer interview. The coalition argues the rule violates federal law and harms asylum seekers, including unaccompanied children; this was a policy opposition letter, not a privacy enforcement action.

CT

NextEra Energy and Dominion Energy

Connecticut and Massachusetts co-led a coalition protest urging FERC to reject the proposed NextEra Energy-Dominion Energy merger. The coalition argued that the merger could increase market power and threaten energy affordability, reliability, and competition; the release does not report a final enforcement decision or penalty.

CT

Unspecified home improvement contractors

Connecticut officials warned residents about potential home improvement scams before an approaching nor’easter, including unlicensed contractors, high-pressure sales tactics, and demands for full payment upfront. The release provides consumer guidance on checking contractors and contract requirements; it does not announce an enforcement action or penalty against a named entity.