Court Rules
All enforcement actions
Enforcement ActionLow RiskMultistate

CT AG and FTC Sue Zillow, Redfin Over $100M Anticompetitive Rental Market Agreement

Zillow and RedfinOctober 1, 2025Connecticut Attorney General

Summary

Connecticut Attorney General William Tong, along with attorneys general from Arizona, New York, Virginia, Washington, and the FTC, sued Zillow and Redfin for an anticompetitive agreement where Zillow paid Redfin $100 million to exit the multifamily rental listing market. The complaint alleges violations of the Sherman Act and Clayton Act, claiming the agreement reduces competition and could lead to higher rents.

Contract Impact

In-house legal teams should review contracts for antitrust risks, including exclusive dealing arrangements, non-compete clauses, market division agreements, and any provisions that could restrict competition. Specifically, check for agreements where one party pays another to exit a market or become an exclusive provider, as such practices may violate Sherman Act Section 1 and Clayton Act Section 7.

Contract Search Terms

exclusive agreementnon-competemarket allocationantitrust complianceexclusive dealingreferral agreementcompetition lawSherman ActClayton Actmonopolization

Laws Cited

Sherman ActClayton Act
15 U.S.C. § 115 U.S.C. § 18

Violation Types

Entity Details

Entity

Zillow and Redfin

Also known as: Zillow; Redfin

Industry

Real Estate

Multistate Coalition

Arizona AGNew York AGVirginia AGWashington AGFTC

Official Sources

Source Evidence

Entity Name
"Zillow and Redfin"
Laws Cited
"Section 1 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1"
Laws Cited
"Section 7 of the Clayton Act, 15 U.S.C. § 18"
Summary
"Zillow paid Redfin $100 million to exit the ILS market for multifamily properties."

Related Enforcement Actions

CT

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration

Connecticut Attorney General William Tong joined a coalition of states and local governments in filing suit against NHTSA over its rule weakening fuel economy standards for new passenger cars and light trucks. The lawsuit alleges the rule violates the agency’s statutory mandate and the Administrative Procedure Act; no penalty or final remedy is reported.

CT

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

Connecticut Attorney General William Tong joined a multistate coalition suing the EPA over its repeal of greenhouse gas pollution limits for power plants and separately filed a notice of intent to sue over regulation of existing gas plants. The coalition asks the court to overturn the repeal and restore the protections; the release reports no monetary penalty or final order.

CT

Sandoz Inc. and Fougera Pharmaceuticals Inc.

$400.0M

Connecticut Attorney General William Tong announced a $400 million settlement with Sandoz Inc. and Fougera Pharmaceuticals Inc. resolving allegations that the generic drug manufacturers conspired to inflate prices, limit competition, and restrain trade. The settlement includes consumer restitution and injunctive reforms; court approval was being sought.

CT

U.S. Department of Homeland Security

Connecticut Attorney General William Tong joined a coalition of 21 attorneys general in submitting a comment letter opposing a DHS rule that allows certain affirmative asylum applications to be referred to removal proceedings without an asylum officer interview. The coalition argues the rule violates federal law and harms asylum seekers, including unaccompanied children; this was a policy opposition letter, not a privacy enforcement action.

CT

NextEra Energy and Dominion Energy

Connecticut and Massachusetts co-led a coalition protest urging FERC to reject the proposed NextEra Energy-Dominion Energy merger. The coalition argued that the merger could increase market power and threaten energy affordability, reliability, and competition; the release does not report a final enforcement decision or penalty.

CT

Unspecified home improvement contractors

Connecticut officials warned residents about potential home improvement scams before an approaching nor’easter, including unlicensed contractors, high-pressure sales tactics, and demands for full payment upfront. The release provides consumer guidance on checking contractors and contract requirements; it does not announce an enforcement action or penalty against a named entity.