Court Rules
All enforcement actions
SettlementCritical Risk

Founders of Celsius Network Ordered to Pay $16.5 Million to Resolve FTC Charges

Alexander Mashinsky, Shlomi Daniel Leon, and Hanoch GoldsteinJuly 20, 2026Federal Trade Commission

Penalty Amount

$16,500,000

Summary

The FTC charged the founders of Celsius Network with deceiving consumers by falsely promising that cryptocurrency deposits were safe and always available. The founders agreed to pay $16.5 million and are banned from marketing or selling products that can be used to deposit or withdraw assets, among other restrictions.

Remedy

Mashinsky must pay $10 million, Leon $4.1 million, and Goldstein $2.4 million. All three are banned from marketing or selling certain asset-related products and from making misrepresentations about any product or service. They are also prohibited from violating the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act. Mashinsky and Leon are additionally barred from disclosing nonpublic personal information without express informed consent.

Monetary PenaltyInjunctionConsent Decree

Contract Impact

In-house legal teams should review vendor and customer agreements involving financial data handling to ensure compliance with the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, particularly clauses addressing the disclosure of nonpublic personal information and the requirement for express informed consent before sharing. They should also audit marketing and advertising contracts for representations about product safety and availability, ensuring they are accurate and not misleading. Additionally, contracts with service providers that handle deposits or withdrawals should include robust data security and accuracy representations, and indemnification provisions for deceptive practices.

Contract Search Terms

Gramm-Leach-Bliley Actnonpublic personal informationexpress informed consentprivacy noticedata security representationdeposit safetymisrepresentation clausefinancial information handlingopt-out consentcustomer data sharing

Laws Cited

FTC ActGramm-Leach-Bliley Act

Violation Types

Entity Details

Entity

Alexander Mashinsky, Shlomi Daniel Leon, and Hanoch Goldstein

Industry

Financial Services

Official Sources

Source Evidence

Entity Name
"Alexander Mashinsky, the former CEO of cryptocurrency platform Celsius Network Inc. (Celsius), and his business partners, Shlomi Daniel Leon and Hanoch “Nuke” Goldstein"
Fine Amount
"will pay a total of $16.5 million"
Fine Amount
"The settlement orders with the FTC require Mashinsky to pay $10 million, Leon to pay $4.1 million and Goldstein to pay $2.4 million."
Laws Cited
"Violating the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act"
Violation Types
"the FTC alleged that Celsius and its co-founders promised consumers that Celsius was “safer” than a bank or other traditional financial institutions and misrepresented that their deposits were safe"
Remedy Types
"Proposed orders also ban defendants from marketing or selling products or services that can be used to deposit or withdraw assets"

Related Enforcement Actions

FTC

Lens.com Inc.

The FTC, Utah, and Nevada sued Lens.com Inc., alleging that it advertised artificially low contact lens prices while hiding mandatory checkout charges and misleading consumers about its AutoRefill subscription. The complaint seeks to stop the alleged practices; the court has not yet decided the case, and no penalty or remedy has been imposed.

FTC

Online platforms

The FTC issued an advance notice of proposed rulemaking seeking public comment on whether ad-optimization tools offered by online platforms may help scammers impersonate businesses and government agencies. This is a proposed regulatory inquiry, not an enforcement action against a named company; no penalty or remedy was imposed.

FTC

Amazon.com, Inc.

$2.5B

A federal court approved a revised order in the FTC's Amazon Prime case under which Amazon will accelerate and expand redress payments under the September 2025 $2.5 billion settlement, which resolved allegations that Amazon enrolled millions of consumers in Prime subscriptions without their consent and knowingly made cancellation difficult. More consumers now qualify for refunds, the maximum payment cap rises from $51 to $200, and all future payments will be distributed automatically starting October 1, 2026, with potential supplemental $149 payments by April 2027. Amazon has already issued more than $845 million in redress payments as of September 2026.

FTC

Amway Corp.

$225.0M

The FTC and the state of Washington filed a joint complaint and proposed stipulated order requiring Amway Corp. and two affiliates—World Wide Group, L.L.C. (WWG) and Leadership Team Development Inc. (LTD)—to pay a $225 million judgment, the largest monetary recovery ever obtained from an MLM in an FTC action, over allegations that they used deceptive earnings claims and unfair tactics to recruit Independent Business Owners. The complaint alleges the companies falsely promised substantial income and recruitment success, pressured IBOs to buy products they could not resell, and instructed IBOs to falsely report sales. Nearly all of the judgment will be used as redress for IBOs who lost money, and the proposed order imposes structural reforms including a 70% resale requirement, independent audits of sales records, and a ban on approved providers charging new IBOs for first-year training.

FTC

FleetCor Technologies Inc. (now Corpay Inc.)

$100.0M

FleetCor Technologies Inc. (now Corpay Inc.) and its CEO Ronald Clarke agreed to pay $100 million to settle an FTC administrative action alleging the company charged small business customers hidden and unauthorized fees for fuel cards and misrepresented gas savings, fraud-control features, and fees. A federal district court granted the FTC summary judgment on all counts in 2023, and a federal appeals court upheld that judgment and the permanent injunction in 2026. The settlement funds will be used to provide redress to harmed business customers.

FTC

Automobile industry (auto dealers) - no named respondent; industry-wide guidance publication

FTC staff published FAQs on price transparency to help the automobile industry comply with the FTC Act, reiterating that an advertised vehicle price must be the actual price any consumer can pay, excluding only government-required charges. The guidance follows warning letters the FTC sent to 97 auto dealership groups earlier in 2026 and signals continued litigation against dealers that advertise one price but charge more through undisclosed fees. No specific entity was charged and no penalty was imposed.