Court Rules
All enforcement actions
Consent DecreeMedium Risk

FTC Settles with Apitor Technology for COPPA Violations

Apitor TechnologySeptember 3, 2025Federal Trade Commission

Penalty Amount

$500,000

Summary

The FTC settled allegations against Apitor Technology for violating COPPA by allowing a third party to collect geolocation data from children without parental consent. Apitor must pay a $500,000 suspended fine, delete improperly collected data, and implement measures to comply with COPPA, including obtaining parental consent and notifying parents.

Remedy

Apitor is required to pay a $500,000 suspended monetary penalty, delete any personal information collected in violation of COPPA unless parental consent is obtained, notify parents before collecting data, obtain verifiable parental consent, delete data upon parental request, and retain data only as necessary. It must also ensure third-party software complies with COPPA.

Monetary PenaltyData DeletionCompliance ProgramCorrective Notice

Contract Impact

In-house legal teams should review all agreements involving services directed to children or that may be used by children, including vendor/customer agreements, data processing addendums (DPAs), and privacy policies/terms of service. Specifically, scrutinize clauses related to data collection (especially sensitive data like geolocation), third-party data sharing or processing, consent mechanisms (requiring verifiable parental consent under COPPA), data retention and deletion obligations, and representations/warranties regarding COPPA compliance. Changes may be needed to: (1) explicitly prohibit collection of children's data without proper consent; (2) impose contractual obligations on third parties to comply with COPPA and provide audit rights; (3) mandate immediate deletion of improperly collected children's data; and (4) update privacy notices to accurately reflect data practices and consent requirements for child users.

Contract Search Terms

parental consent mechanismthird-party data sharing clausegeolocation data collectionCOPPA compliance clausechildren's personal informationdata processing addendumverifiable parental consentdata retention and deletion policyservice provider agreementprivacy policy (children's section)

Laws Cited

COPPA

Violation Types

Entity Details

Entity

Apitor Technology

Industry

Technology

Official Sources

Source Evidence

Entity Name
"Apitor Technology"
Fine Amount
"$500,000 penalty"
Laws Cited
"COPPA"
Violation Types
"allowing a third party in China to collect geolocation information from children without parental consent."

Related Enforcement Actions

FTC

Lens.com Inc.

The FTC, Utah, and Nevada sued Lens.com Inc., alleging that it advertised artificially low contact lens prices while hiding mandatory checkout charges and misleading consumers about its AutoRefill subscription. The complaint seeks to stop the alleged practices; the court has not yet decided the case, and no penalty or remedy has been imposed.

FTC

Online platforms

The FTC issued an advance notice of proposed rulemaking seeking public comment on whether ad-optimization tools offered by online platforms may help scammers impersonate businesses and government agencies. This is a proposed regulatory inquiry, not an enforcement action against a named company; no penalty or remedy was imposed.

FTC

Amazon.com, Inc.

$2.5B

A federal court approved a revised order in the FTC's Amazon Prime case under which Amazon will accelerate and expand redress payments under the September 2025 $2.5 billion settlement, which resolved allegations that Amazon enrolled millions of consumers in Prime subscriptions without their consent and knowingly made cancellation difficult. More consumers now qualify for refunds, the maximum payment cap rises from $51 to $200, and all future payments will be distributed automatically starting October 1, 2026, with potential supplemental $149 payments by April 2027. Amazon has already issued more than $845 million in redress payments as of September 2026.

FTC

Amway Corp.

$225.0M

The FTC and the state of Washington filed a joint complaint and proposed stipulated order requiring Amway Corp. and two affiliates—World Wide Group, L.L.C. (WWG) and Leadership Team Development Inc. (LTD)—to pay a $225 million judgment, the largest monetary recovery ever obtained from an MLM in an FTC action, over allegations that they used deceptive earnings claims and unfair tactics to recruit Independent Business Owners. The complaint alleges the companies falsely promised substantial income and recruitment success, pressured IBOs to buy products they could not resell, and instructed IBOs to falsely report sales. Nearly all of the judgment will be used as redress for IBOs who lost money, and the proposed order imposes structural reforms including a 70% resale requirement, independent audits of sales records, and a ban on approved providers charging new IBOs for first-year training.

FTC

FleetCor Technologies Inc. (now Corpay Inc.)

$100.0M

FleetCor Technologies Inc. (now Corpay Inc.) and its CEO Ronald Clarke agreed to pay $100 million to settle an FTC administrative action alleging the company charged small business customers hidden and unauthorized fees for fuel cards and misrepresented gas savings, fraud-control features, and fees. A federal district court granted the FTC summary judgment on all counts in 2023, and a federal appeals court upheld that judgment and the permanent injunction in 2026. The settlement funds will be used to provide redress to harmed business customers.

FTC

Automobile industry (auto dealers) - no named respondent; industry-wide guidance publication

FTC staff published FAQs on price transparency to help the automobile industry comply with the FTC Act, reiterating that an advertised vehicle price must be the actual price any consumer can pay, excluding only government-required charges. The guidance follows warning letters the FTC sent to 97 auto dealership groups earlier in 2026 and signals continued litigation against dealers that advertise one price but charge more through undisclosed fees. No specific entity was charged and no penalty was imposed.