Penalty Amount
$930,000
The FTC alleged that Cox Media Group (CMG), MindSift LLC, and 1010 Digital Works LLC deceived customers by falsely claiming to offer an AI-powered 'Active Listening' service that could target ads based on conversations captured from consumers' smart devices, and that consumers had opted into such targeting. In reality, the service did not use voice data and consumers had not consented. The companies agreed to pay a total of $930,000 and are prohibited from making misrepresentations about their services, voice data collection, and consumer consent.
CMG must pay $880,000, MindSift and 1010 Digital Works each pay $25,000, totaling $930,000 for consumer redress. All defendants are prohibited from misrepresenting the qualities or features of their advertising services, the collection and use of voice data, consumer consent, and geographic targeting capabilities.
In-house legal teams should review vendor agreements with marketing and data broker partners to ensure that any claims about AI-powered services, voice data collection, or consumer consent are accurate and substantiated. Specifically, contracts should include representations and warranties that services do not rely on unauthorized data collection, that any claimed consumer consent is obtained through proper opt-in mechanisms (not merely terms of service acceptance), and that data sourcing (e.g., email lists) is transparent and compliant with privacy laws. Clauses related to data processing, consent, and audit rights should be strengthened to prevent deceptive marketing practices and to ensure vendors do not resell data without proper authorization.
Entity
Cox Media Group
Industry
AdvertisingOfficial Press Release
https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/news/press-releases/2026/05/ftc-require-cox-media-group-two-other-firms-pay-nearly-1-million-settle-charges-they-deceived
CMGComplaintwithoutsignatures
https://www.ftc.gov/system/files/ftc_gov/pdf/CMGComplaintwithoutsignatures.pdf
Mindsift Complaint withoutsignatures
https://www.ftc.gov/system/files/ftc_gov/pdf/Mindsift-Complaint-withoutsignatures.pdf
1010digitalworksllccomplaintwithoutsignatures
https://www.ftc.gov/system/files/ftc_gov/pdf/1010digitalworksllccomplaintwithoutsignatures.pdf
CMGDecisionandOrderwithoutsignatures
https://www.ftc.gov/system/files/ftc_gov/pdf/CMGDecisionandOrderwithoutsignatures.pdf
Mindsift DecisionandOrder withoutsignatures
https://www.ftc.gov/system/files/ftc_gov/pdf/Mindsift-DecisionandOrder-withoutsignatures.pdf
1010digitalworksllcdecisionandorderwithoutsignatures
https://www.ftc.gov/system/files/ftc_gov/pdf/1010digitalworksllcdecisionandorderwithoutsignatures.pdf
Federal Trade Commission Enforcement Page
https://www.ftc.gov/enforcement
"Cox Media Group (CMG)"
"pay a total of $930,000"
"Section 5 of the FTC Act"
"deceived customers by falsely claiming to offer an AI-powered service that could target localized ads based on conversations captured from consumers’ smart devices and that consumers had opted into such targeting"
"the marketing service wasn’t based on voice data and consumers hadn’t opted into this service"
"CMG must pay $880,000 while both MindSift and 1010 Digital Works will each pay $25,000"
The FTC, Utah, and Nevada sued Lens.com Inc., alleging that it advertised artificially low contact lens prices while hiding mandatory checkout charges and misleading consumers about its AutoRefill subscription. The complaint seeks to stop the alleged practices; the court has not yet decided the case, and no penalty or remedy has been imposed.
The FTC issued an advance notice of proposed rulemaking seeking public comment on whether ad-optimization tools offered by online platforms may help scammers impersonate businesses and government agencies. This is a proposed regulatory inquiry, not an enforcement action against a named company; no penalty or remedy was imposed.
$2.5B
A federal court approved a revised order in the FTC's Amazon Prime case under which Amazon will accelerate and expand redress payments under the September 2025 $2.5 billion settlement, which resolved allegations that Amazon enrolled millions of consumers in Prime subscriptions without their consent and knowingly made cancellation difficult. More consumers now qualify for refunds, the maximum payment cap rises from $51 to $200, and all future payments will be distributed automatically starting October 1, 2026, with potential supplemental $149 payments by April 2027. Amazon has already issued more than $845 million in redress payments as of September 2026.
$225.0M
The FTC and the state of Washington filed a joint complaint and proposed stipulated order requiring Amway Corp. and two affiliates—World Wide Group, L.L.C. (WWG) and Leadership Team Development Inc. (LTD)—to pay a $225 million judgment, the largest monetary recovery ever obtained from an MLM in an FTC action, over allegations that they used deceptive earnings claims and unfair tactics to recruit Independent Business Owners. The complaint alleges the companies falsely promised substantial income and recruitment success, pressured IBOs to buy products they could not resell, and instructed IBOs to falsely report sales. Nearly all of the judgment will be used as redress for IBOs who lost money, and the proposed order imposes structural reforms including a 70% resale requirement, independent audits of sales records, and a ban on approved providers charging new IBOs for first-year training.
$100.0M
FleetCor Technologies Inc. (now Corpay Inc.) and its CEO Ronald Clarke agreed to pay $100 million to settle an FTC administrative action alleging the company charged small business customers hidden and unauthorized fees for fuel cards and misrepresented gas savings, fraud-control features, and fees. A federal district court granted the FTC summary judgment on all counts in 2023, and a federal appeals court upheld that judgment and the permanent injunction in 2026. The settlement funds will be used to provide redress to harmed business customers.
FTC staff published FAQs on price transparency to help the automobile industry comply with the FTC Act, reiterating that an advertised vehicle price must be the actual price any consumer can pay, excluding only government-required charges. The guidance follows warning letters the FTC sent to 97 auto dealership groups earlier in 2026 and signals continued litigation against dealers that advertise one price but charge more through undisclosed fees. No specific entity was charged and no penalty was imposed.