Penalty Amount
$700,000
CRI Genetics, LLC was charged by the FTC and California Attorney General for deceptive marketing of DNA testing services, including false accuracy claims, fake reviews, and using dark patterns in billing. The company agreed to a settlement, paying a $700,000 civil penalty, and is prohibited from deceptive practices, must obtain consent for data sharing, and allow data deletion for consumers who requested it.
CRI Genetics must pay a $700,000 civil penalty, cease all deceptive marketing practices, disclose total costs and charging practices, obtain explicit consent before sharing DNA information, and delete genetic data for consumers who received refunds and requested deletion.
In-house legal teams should review customer-facing agreements (terms of service, billing authorizations, and marketing materials) and vendor/data processor agreements. Key clauses to scrutinize include: 1) representations and warranties regarding product/service accuracy and performance claims; 2) provisions governing the use and authenticity of reviews, testimonials, and endorsements; 3) billing and payment terms, especially those involving automatic renewals, negative option marketing, or 'dark pattern' design elements that could mislead consumers; 4) data processing and sharing clauses, ensuring explicit, granular consent is obtained for sharing biometric/genetic data; and 5) consumer rights sections, guaranteeing a clear, accessible mechanism for data deletion requests. Agreements may need amendments to remove unsubstantiated accuracy claims, implement unambiguous consent mechanisms for data sharing, establish a compliant data deletion process, and redesign any billing interfaces or terms that employ deceptive patterns.
Entity
CRI Genetics, LLC
Also known as: CRI Genetics
Industry
HealthcareOfficial Press Release
https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/news/press-releases/2023/11/ftc-california-obtain-order-against-dna-testing-firm-over-charges-it-made-myriad-misrepresentations
crigeneticscomplaint
https://www.ftc.gov/system/files/ftc_gov/pdf/crigeneticscomplaint.pdf
crigeneticsstipulatedorder
https://www.ftc.gov/system/files/ftc_gov/pdf/crigeneticsstipulatedorder.pdf
Federal Trade Commission Enforcement Page
https://www.ftc.gov/enforcement
"CRI Genetics, LLC (CRI)"
"$700,000 civil penalty"
"FTC Act"
"California’s Unfair Competition Law"
"False Advertising Law"
"used 'dark patterns' in its online billing process to trick consumers into paying for products they did not want and did not agree to buy"
The FTC, Utah, and Nevada sued Lens.com Inc., alleging that it advertised artificially low contact lens prices while hiding mandatory checkout charges and misleading consumers about its AutoRefill subscription. The complaint seeks to stop the alleged practices; the court has not yet decided the case, and no penalty or remedy has been imposed.
The FTC issued an advance notice of proposed rulemaking seeking public comment on whether ad-optimization tools offered by online platforms may help scammers impersonate businesses and government agencies. This is a proposed regulatory inquiry, not an enforcement action against a named company; no penalty or remedy was imposed.
$2.5B
A federal court approved a revised order in the FTC's Amazon Prime case under which Amazon will accelerate and expand redress payments under the September 2025 $2.5 billion settlement, which resolved allegations that Amazon enrolled millions of consumers in Prime subscriptions without their consent and knowingly made cancellation difficult. More consumers now qualify for refunds, the maximum payment cap rises from $51 to $200, and all future payments will be distributed automatically starting October 1, 2026, with potential supplemental $149 payments by April 2027. Amazon has already issued more than $845 million in redress payments as of September 2026.
$225.0M
The FTC and the state of Washington filed a joint complaint and proposed stipulated order requiring Amway Corp. and two affiliates—World Wide Group, L.L.C. (WWG) and Leadership Team Development Inc. (LTD)—to pay a $225 million judgment, the largest monetary recovery ever obtained from an MLM in an FTC action, over allegations that they used deceptive earnings claims and unfair tactics to recruit Independent Business Owners. The complaint alleges the companies falsely promised substantial income and recruitment success, pressured IBOs to buy products they could not resell, and instructed IBOs to falsely report sales. Nearly all of the judgment will be used as redress for IBOs who lost money, and the proposed order imposes structural reforms including a 70% resale requirement, independent audits of sales records, and a ban on approved providers charging new IBOs for first-year training.
$100.0M
FleetCor Technologies Inc. (now Corpay Inc.) and its CEO Ronald Clarke agreed to pay $100 million to settle an FTC administrative action alleging the company charged small business customers hidden and unauthorized fees for fuel cards and misrepresented gas savings, fraud-control features, and fees. A federal district court granted the FTC summary judgment on all counts in 2023, and a federal appeals court upheld that judgment and the permanent injunction in 2026. The settlement funds will be used to provide redress to harmed business customers.
FTC staff published FAQs on price transparency to help the automobile industry comply with the FTC Act, reiterating that an advertised vehicle price must be the actual price any consumer can pay, excluding only government-required charges. The guidance follows warning letters the FTC sent to 97 auto dealership groups earlier in 2026 and signals continued litigation against dealers that advertise one price but charge more through undisclosed fees. No specific entity was charged and no penalty was imposed.