Penalty Amount
$275,000,000
Epic Games, maker of Fortnite, violated children's privacy laws by collecting data from under-13 users without parental consent and used deceptive designs to trick users into unintended purchases. The FTC secured a $275 million civil penalty and $245 million in consumer refunds, with requirements to enhance privacy defaults, delete improperly collected data, implement a privacy program, and prohibit dark patterns and account locking for charge disputes.
Epic must pay a $275 million penalty to the U.S. Treasury, provide $245 million in refunds to consumers, delete personal information collected from children without parental consent, implement a comprehensive privacy program with independent audits, change default privacy settings to turn off voice and text communications for children and teens unless affirmatively consented, and is prohibited from using dark patterns to induce purchases or blocking account access for disputed charges.
In-house legal teams should review all customer-facing agreements, particularly Terms of Service (ToS), End User License Agreements (EULA), and in-app purchase/billing terms for users of any online service or game. Key clauses to scrutinize include: (1) consent mechanisms for data collection, especially for users identified or likely to be under 13, ensuring they mandate verifiable parental consent; (2) billing and purchase clauses to identify and eliminate 'dark patterns'—deceptive UI/UX designs that trick users into unintended charges; (3) account management terms that prohibit locking or restricting accounts for disputing charges; (4) data handling and retention clauses to ensure improper children's data is deleted and collection is limited; and (5) privacy setting clauses to enforce strong defaults for minors (e.g., disabling voice/text chat). Changes will likely involve rewriting consent flows, redesigning purchase interfaces for clarity, implementing robust refund processes, and establishing enforceable privacy-by-default configurations for younger users.
Entity
Epic Games, Inc.
Also known as: Epic Games
Industry
GamingOfficial Press Release
https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/news/press-releases/2022/12/fortnite-video-game-maker-epic-games-pay-more-half-billion-dollars-over-ftc-allegations
2223087EpicGamesComplaint
https://www.ftc.gov/system/files/ftc_gov/pdf/2223087EpicGamesComplaint.pdf
2223087EpicGamesSettlement
https://www.ftc.gov/system/files/ftc_gov/pdf/2223087EpicGamesSettlement.pdf
1923203EpicGamesComplaint
https://www.ftc.gov/system/files/ftc_gov/pdf/1923203EpicGamesComplaint.pdf
1923203EpicGamesACCO
https://www.ftc.gov/system/files/ftc_gov/pdf/1923203EpicGamesACCO.pdf
Federal Trade Commission Enforcement Page
https://www.ftc.gov/enforcement
"Epic Games, Inc., creator of the popular video game Fortnite"
"Epic will pay a $275 million penalty"
"violated the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA)"
"FTC Act’s prohibition against unfair practices"
"violated the COPPA Rule"
"collecting personal information from children under 13 who played Fortnite, a child-directed online service, without notifying their parents or obtaining their parents’ verifiable consent."
The FTC, Utah, and Nevada sued Lens.com Inc., alleging that it advertised artificially low contact lens prices while hiding mandatory checkout charges and misleading consumers about its AutoRefill subscription. The complaint seeks to stop the alleged practices; the court has not yet decided the case, and no penalty or remedy has been imposed.
The FTC issued an advance notice of proposed rulemaking seeking public comment on whether ad-optimization tools offered by online platforms may help scammers impersonate businesses and government agencies. This is a proposed regulatory inquiry, not an enforcement action against a named company; no penalty or remedy was imposed.
$2.5B
A federal court approved a revised order in the FTC's Amazon Prime case under which Amazon will accelerate and expand redress payments under the September 2025 $2.5 billion settlement, which resolved allegations that Amazon enrolled millions of consumers in Prime subscriptions without their consent and knowingly made cancellation difficult. More consumers now qualify for refunds, the maximum payment cap rises from $51 to $200, and all future payments will be distributed automatically starting October 1, 2026, with potential supplemental $149 payments by April 2027. Amazon has already issued more than $845 million in redress payments as of September 2026.
$225.0M
The FTC and the state of Washington filed a joint complaint and proposed stipulated order requiring Amway Corp. and two affiliates—World Wide Group, L.L.C. (WWG) and Leadership Team Development Inc. (LTD)—to pay a $225 million judgment, the largest monetary recovery ever obtained from an MLM in an FTC action, over allegations that they used deceptive earnings claims and unfair tactics to recruit Independent Business Owners. The complaint alleges the companies falsely promised substantial income and recruitment success, pressured IBOs to buy products they could not resell, and instructed IBOs to falsely report sales. Nearly all of the judgment will be used as redress for IBOs who lost money, and the proposed order imposes structural reforms including a 70% resale requirement, independent audits of sales records, and a ban on approved providers charging new IBOs for first-year training.
$100.0M
FleetCor Technologies Inc. (now Corpay Inc.) and its CEO Ronald Clarke agreed to pay $100 million to settle an FTC administrative action alleging the company charged small business customers hidden and unauthorized fees for fuel cards and misrepresented gas savings, fraud-control features, and fees. A federal district court granted the FTC summary judgment on all counts in 2023, and a federal appeals court upheld that judgment and the permanent injunction in 2026. The settlement funds will be used to provide redress to harmed business customers.
FTC staff published FAQs on price transparency to help the automobile industry comply with the FTC Act, reiterating that an advertised vehicle price must be the actual price any consumer can pay, excluding only government-required charges. The guidance follows warning letters the FTC sent to 97 auto dealership groups earlier in 2026 and signals continued litigation against dealers that advertise one price but charge more through undisclosed fees. No specific entity was charged and no penalty was imposed.