Court Rules
All enforcement actions
SettlementMedium RiskMultistate

FTC Returns Nearly $3 Million to Consumers Deceived by Mortgage Relief Scheme

Golden Home ServicesJune 9, 2026Federal Trade Commission

Penalty Amount

$3,000,000

Consumers Affected

1,821

Summary

The FTC is returning nearly $3 million to consumers deceived by the Golden Home Services mortgage relief scheme, which falsely promised to reduce homeowners' mortgage payments and prevent foreclosures. A federal court banned the companies and their operators from telemarketing and debt relief businesses and required them to pay millions. The refunds are being mailed to 1,821 affected homeowners.

Remedy

The court banned the companies and operators from telemarketing and debt relief businesses, required them to pay millions of dollars, and the FTC is returning nearly $3 million to 1,821 affected homeowners via mailed checks.

Monetary PenaltyBanConsumer Refunds

Contract Impact

In-house legal teams should review vendor agreements with mortgage relief or debt relief service providers, focusing on clauses related to truthful advertising, compliance with FTC rules on telemarketing and debt relief, and indemnification for deceptive practices. Customer agreements should be checked for clear disclosures about services and fees, and any clauses that could be interpreted as false promises. Employee contracts should include training requirements on regulatory compliance and prohibitions against misleading marketing.

Contract Search Terms

mortgage reliefdebt relieftelemarketing banconsumer refundsforeclosure preventionfalse promisesfinancial services agreementcompliance program

Laws Cited

FTC Act

Violation Types

Entity Details

Entity

Golden Home Services

Industry

Financial Services

Multistate Coalition

California Department of Financial Protection and Innovation

Official Sources

Source Evidence

Entity Name
"Golden Home Services"
Fine Amount
"nearly $3 million"
Violation Types
"falsely promised to reduce homeowners’ mortgage payments and prevent foreclosures"
Remedy Types
"banned these companies and their operators from the telemarketing and debt relief businesses"
Consumers Affected
"1,821 affected homeowners"
Co Enforcers
"California Department of Financial Protection and Innovation"

Related Enforcement Actions

FTC

Lens.com Inc.

The FTC, Utah, and Nevada sued Lens.com Inc., alleging that it advertised artificially low contact lens prices while hiding mandatory checkout charges and misleading consumers about its AutoRefill subscription. The complaint seeks to stop the alleged practices; the court has not yet decided the case, and no penalty or remedy has been imposed.

FTC

Online platforms

The FTC issued an advance notice of proposed rulemaking seeking public comment on whether ad-optimization tools offered by online platforms may help scammers impersonate businesses and government agencies. This is a proposed regulatory inquiry, not an enforcement action against a named company; no penalty or remedy was imposed.

FTC

Amazon.com, Inc.

$2.5B

A federal court approved a revised order in the FTC's Amazon Prime case under which Amazon will accelerate and expand redress payments under the September 2025 $2.5 billion settlement, which resolved allegations that Amazon enrolled millions of consumers in Prime subscriptions without their consent and knowingly made cancellation difficult. More consumers now qualify for refunds, the maximum payment cap rises from $51 to $200, and all future payments will be distributed automatically starting October 1, 2026, with potential supplemental $149 payments by April 2027. Amazon has already issued more than $845 million in redress payments as of September 2026.

FTC

Amway Corp.

$225.0M

The FTC and the state of Washington filed a joint complaint and proposed stipulated order requiring Amway Corp. and two affiliates—World Wide Group, L.L.C. (WWG) and Leadership Team Development Inc. (LTD)—to pay a $225 million judgment, the largest monetary recovery ever obtained from an MLM in an FTC action, over allegations that they used deceptive earnings claims and unfair tactics to recruit Independent Business Owners. The complaint alleges the companies falsely promised substantial income and recruitment success, pressured IBOs to buy products they could not resell, and instructed IBOs to falsely report sales. Nearly all of the judgment will be used as redress for IBOs who lost money, and the proposed order imposes structural reforms including a 70% resale requirement, independent audits of sales records, and a ban on approved providers charging new IBOs for first-year training.

FTC

FleetCor Technologies Inc. (now Corpay Inc.)

$100.0M

FleetCor Technologies Inc. (now Corpay Inc.) and its CEO Ronald Clarke agreed to pay $100 million to settle an FTC administrative action alleging the company charged small business customers hidden and unauthorized fees for fuel cards and misrepresented gas savings, fraud-control features, and fees. A federal district court granted the FTC summary judgment on all counts in 2023, and a federal appeals court upheld that judgment and the permanent injunction in 2026. The settlement funds will be used to provide redress to harmed business customers.

FTC

Automobile industry (auto dealers) - no named respondent; industry-wide guidance publication

FTC staff published FAQs on price transparency to help the automobile industry comply with the FTC Act, reiterating that an advertised vehicle price must be the actual price any consumer can pay, excluding only government-required charges. The guidance follows warning letters the FTC sent to 97 auto dealership groups earlier in 2026 and signals continued litigation against dealers that advertise one price but charge more through undisclosed fees. No specific entity was charged and no penalty was imposed.