Court Rules
All enforcement actions
SettlementHigh RiskMultistate

FTC and States Settle Kars-R-Us.com for $3.88M Over Deceptive Charity Fundraising

Kars-R-Us.com, Inc.September 26, 2025Federal Trade Commission

Penalty Amount

$3,882,091

Consumers Affected

84,000

Summary

The FTC and 19 states settled with Kars-R-Us.com, Inc. and its operators for deceptive charity fundraising claims, where only 0.28% of over $45 million raised was used for breast cancer screenings. Operators face permanent fundraising bans and a $3.88 million monetary judgment.

Remedy

Kars and its operators are permanently banned from fundraising and making misrepresentations, must substantiate all claims, and pay a monetary judgment of $3,882,091, with full amount payable if they misrepresent financial status.

BanInjunctionConsent DecreeMonetary Penalty

Contract Impact

In-house legal teams should review vendor contracts for clauses related to charitable fundraising representations, ensuring requirements for substantiating claims, prohibitions on misrepresentations, and audit provisions to monitor fund usage. Contracts should include clear terms on how donations are used and penalties for non-compliance, and consider bans on fundraising activities for violators.

Contract Search Terms

charitable fundraisingdeceptive marketingclaim substantiationdonation usage disclosurefundraising service agreementmisrepresentation prohibitionaudit rightsconsumer protection compliancecharity fraudfundraising bans

Violation Types

Entity Details

Entity

Kars-R-Us.com, Inc.

Also known as: Kars-R-Us.com

Industry

Other

Multistate Coalition

Arkansas Attorney GeneralCalifornia Attorney GeneralColorado Attorney GeneralConnecticut Attorney GeneralDelaware Attorney GeneralFlorida Attorney GeneralGeorgia Attorney GeneralIllinois Attorney GeneralIndiana Attorney GeneralMaryland Attorney GeneralMaryland Secretary of StateNew York Attorney GeneralNorth Carolina Attorney GeneralNorth Carolina Secretary of StateOklahoma Attorney GeneralOregon Attorney GeneralSouth Carolina Secretary of StateUtah Attorney GeneralUtah Division of Consumer ProtectionVirginia Attorney GeneralWest Virginia Attorney GeneralWisconsin Attorney General

Official Sources

Source Evidence

Entity Name
"Kars-R-Us.com, Inc. (Kars)"
Fine Amount
"a total monetary judgment of $3,882,091"
Violation Types
"Kars claimed that vehicle donations would allow UBCF to “save lives” by providing free and low-cost breast cancer screenings. But, in reality, only $126,815 or 0.28% of the more than $45 million that Kars raised was used to provide breast cancer screenings"

Related Enforcement Actions

FTC

Lens.com Inc.

The FTC, Utah, and Nevada sued Lens.com Inc., alleging that it advertised artificially low contact lens prices while hiding mandatory checkout charges and misleading consumers about its AutoRefill subscription. The complaint seeks to stop the alleged practices; the court has not yet decided the case, and no penalty or remedy has been imposed.

FTC

Online platforms

The FTC issued an advance notice of proposed rulemaking seeking public comment on whether ad-optimization tools offered by online platforms may help scammers impersonate businesses and government agencies. This is a proposed regulatory inquiry, not an enforcement action against a named company; no penalty or remedy was imposed.

FTC

Amazon.com, Inc.

$2.5B

A federal court approved a revised order in the FTC's Amazon Prime case under which Amazon will accelerate and expand redress payments under the September 2025 $2.5 billion settlement, which resolved allegations that Amazon enrolled millions of consumers in Prime subscriptions without their consent and knowingly made cancellation difficult. More consumers now qualify for refunds, the maximum payment cap rises from $51 to $200, and all future payments will be distributed automatically starting October 1, 2026, with potential supplemental $149 payments by April 2027. Amazon has already issued more than $845 million in redress payments as of September 2026.

FTC

Amway Corp.

$225.0M

The FTC and the state of Washington filed a joint complaint and proposed stipulated order requiring Amway Corp. and two affiliates—World Wide Group, L.L.C. (WWG) and Leadership Team Development Inc. (LTD)—to pay a $225 million judgment, the largest monetary recovery ever obtained from an MLM in an FTC action, over allegations that they used deceptive earnings claims and unfair tactics to recruit Independent Business Owners. The complaint alleges the companies falsely promised substantial income and recruitment success, pressured IBOs to buy products they could not resell, and instructed IBOs to falsely report sales. Nearly all of the judgment will be used as redress for IBOs who lost money, and the proposed order imposes structural reforms including a 70% resale requirement, independent audits of sales records, and a ban on approved providers charging new IBOs for first-year training.

FTC

FleetCor Technologies Inc. (now Corpay Inc.)

$100.0M

FleetCor Technologies Inc. (now Corpay Inc.) and its CEO Ronald Clarke agreed to pay $100 million to settle an FTC administrative action alleging the company charged small business customers hidden and unauthorized fees for fuel cards and misrepresented gas savings, fraud-control features, and fees. A federal district court granted the FTC summary judgment on all counts in 2023, and a federal appeals court upheld that judgment and the permanent injunction in 2026. The settlement funds will be used to provide redress to harmed business customers.

FTC

Automobile industry (auto dealers) - no named respondent; industry-wide guidance publication

FTC staff published FAQs on price transparency to help the automobile industry comply with the FTC Act, reiterating that an advertised vehicle price must be the actual price any consumer can pay, excluding only government-required charges. The guidance follows warning letters the FTC sent to 97 auto dealership groups earlier in 2026 and signals continued litigation against dealers that advertise one price but charge more through undisclosed fees. No specific entity was charged and no penalty was imposed.