Court Rules
All enforcement actions
Consent DecreeHigh Risk

FTC Settles Kuuhuub Over $3M COPPA Violation

Kuuhuub Inc.July 1, 2021Federal Trade Commission

Penalty Amount

$3,000,000

Summary

The FTC settled with Kuuhuub Inc., operator of the Recolor coloring book app, for violating COPPA by collecting personal information from children under 13 without parental consent. The app's social media features allowed children to register and share data, and third-party ad networks collected persistent identifiers for targeted ads. The settlement requires deletion of children's data, refunds to underage subscribers, a $3 million penalty (suspended upon $100,000 payment), and user notifications about the violations.

Remedy

The companies must delete all personal information collected from children under 13 unless parental consent is obtained, offer refunds to current paid subscribers who were under 18 at sign-up, pay a $3 million monetary penalty (suspended upon payment of $100,000), and notify app users about the COPPA violations and steps to take.

Monetary PenaltyData DeletionConsumer RefundsCorrective Notice

Contract Impact

In-house legal teams should review all agreements involving the Recolor app or similar child-directed services, including vendor contracts with third-party ad networks, customer-facing terms of service and privacy policies, and any data processing agreements. Focus on clauses governing data collection from minors, consent mechanisms (especially verifiable parental consent), third-party data sharing and advertising integrations, data retention and deletion policies, and age-screening procedures. Updates may be needed to ensure robust parental consent workflows, restrict collection of personal information from users under 13, audit and restrict third-party ad network data practices, implement clear children's privacy notices, and establish automatic data deletion protocols for underage users to comply with COPPA.

Contract Search Terms

verifiable parental consentchildren's data collection clausethird-party data sharing agreementad network SDK integrationage-screening mechanismdata retention policy for minorsCOPPA compliance addendumparental consent formchildren's privacy noticedata deletion upon request

Laws Cited

Violation Types

Entity Details

Entity

Kuuhuub Inc.

Also known as: Kuuhuub

Industry

Technology

Official Sources

Source Evidence

Entity Name
"Kuuhuub Inc."
Fine Amount
"$3 million monetary penalty"
Laws Cited
"Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act Rule (COPPA Rule)"
Violation Types
"collecting personal information from children under the age of 13"
Violation Types
"failed to provide notice to parents"
Violation Types
"failed to obtain verifiable parental consent"

Related Enforcement Actions

FTC

Lens.com Inc.

The FTC, Utah, and Nevada sued Lens.com Inc., alleging that it advertised artificially low contact lens prices while hiding mandatory checkout charges and misleading consumers about its AutoRefill subscription. The complaint seeks to stop the alleged practices; the court has not yet decided the case, and no penalty or remedy has been imposed.

FTC

Online platforms

The FTC issued an advance notice of proposed rulemaking seeking public comment on whether ad-optimization tools offered by online platforms may help scammers impersonate businesses and government agencies. This is a proposed regulatory inquiry, not an enforcement action against a named company; no penalty or remedy was imposed.

FTC

Amazon.com, Inc.

$2.5B

A federal court approved a revised order in the FTC's Amazon Prime case under which Amazon will accelerate and expand redress payments under the September 2025 $2.5 billion settlement, which resolved allegations that Amazon enrolled millions of consumers in Prime subscriptions without their consent and knowingly made cancellation difficult. More consumers now qualify for refunds, the maximum payment cap rises from $51 to $200, and all future payments will be distributed automatically starting October 1, 2026, with potential supplemental $149 payments by April 2027. Amazon has already issued more than $845 million in redress payments as of September 2026.

FTC

Amway Corp.

$225.0M

The FTC and the state of Washington filed a joint complaint and proposed stipulated order requiring Amway Corp. and two affiliates—World Wide Group, L.L.C. (WWG) and Leadership Team Development Inc. (LTD)—to pay a $225 million judgment, the largest monetary recovery ever obtained from an MLM in an FTC action, over allegations that they used deceptive earnings claims and unfair tactics to recruit Independent Business Owners. The complaint alleges the companies falsely promised substantial income and recruitment success, pressured IBOs to buy products they could not resell, and instructed IBOs to falsely report sales. Nearly all of the judgment will be used as redress for IBOs who lost money, and the proposed order imposes structural reforms including a 70% resale requirement, independent audits of sales records, and a ban on approved providers charging new IBOs for first-year training.

FTC

FleetCor Technologies Inc. (now Corpay Inc.)

$100.0M

FleetCor Technologies Inc. (now Corpay Inc.) and its CEO Ronald Clarke agreed to pay $100 million to settle an FTC administrative action alleging the company charged small business customers hidden and unauthorized fees for fuel cards and misrepresented gas savings, fraud-control features, and fees. A federal district court granted the FTC summary judgment on all counts in 2023, and a federal appeals court upheld that judgment and the permanent injunction in 2026. The settlement funds will be used to provide redress to harmed business customers.

FTC

Automobile industry (auto dealers) - no named respondent; industry-wide guidance publication

FTC staff published FAQs on price transparency to help the automobile industry comply with the FTC Act, reiterating that an advertised vehicle price must be the actual price any consumer can pay, excluding only government-required charges. The guidance follows warning letters the FTC sent to 97 auto dealership groups earlier in 2026 and signals continued litigation against dealers that advertise one price but charge more through undisclosed fees. No specific entity was charged and no penalty was imposed.