Penalty Amount
$2,500,000
Consumers Affected
84,000
Monument, Inc., an alcohol addiction treatment firm, shared consumers' health data with third-party advertising platforms like Meta and Google without consent, despite promising confidentiality. The FTC settled with a consent order that bans Monument from disclosing health data for advertising, requires affirmative consent for other sharing, imposes a $2.5 million suspended fine, and mandates data deletion, consumer notification, and a privacy program.
Monument is banned from disclosing health information for advertising and must obtain affirmative consent before sharing health information for any other purpose. The company must pay a $2.5 million civil penalty (suspended), delete user data shared with third parties, notify affected consumers, and implement a comprehensive privacy program with data retention limits.
In-house legal teams should review all agreements involving consumer health data, particularly vendor contracts with advertising platforms (e.g., Meta, Google), customer Terms of Service/Privacy Policies, and Data Processing Agreements (DPAs). Specific clauses to scrutinize include: (1) data sharing and licensing provisions to ensure they explicitly prohibit using sensitive health information for advertising/targeting; (2) consent mechanisms to verify they require clear, affirmative, and separate consent for any health data sharing beyond core service delivery; (3) confidentiality and data security clauses to align with promised protections; and (4) audit and compliance reporting requirements. Changes needed will likely involve adding explicit bans on using health data for ads, implementing granular consent flows, strengthening data deletion protocols, and mandating regular privacy program assessments and reporting.
Entity
Monument, Inc.
Also known as: Monument
Industry
HealthcareOfficial Press Release
https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/news/press-releases/2024/04/alcohol-addiction-treatment-firm-will-be-banned-disclosing-health-data-advertising-settle-ftc
MonumentOrderFiled
https://www.ftc.gov/system/files/ftc_gov/pdf/MonumentOrderFiled.pdf
MonumentComplaintFiled
https://www.ftc.gov/system/files/ftc_gov/pdf/MonumentComplaintFiled.pdf
Federal Trade Commission Enforcement Page
https://www.ftc.gov/enforcement
"New York-based Monument, Inc."
"imposes a $2.5 million civil penalty"
"FTC Act’s prohibition against unfair and deceptive practices"
"Opioid Addiction Recovery Fraud Prevention Act of 2018 (OARFPA)"
"FTC says Monument shared consumers’ health data with third-party advertising platforms without consent"
The FTC, Utah, and Nevada sued Lens.com Inc., alleging that it advertised artificially low contact lens prices while hiding mandatory checkout charges and misleading consumers about its AutoRefill subscription. The complaint seeks to stop the alleged practices; the court has not yet decided the case, and no penalty or remedy has been imposed.
The FTC issued an advance notice of proposed rulemaking seeking public comment on whether ad-optimization tools offered by online platforms may help scammers impersonate businesses and government agencies. This is a proposed regulatory inquiry, not an enforcement action against a named company; no penalty or remedy was imposed.
$2.5B
A federal court approved a revised order in the FTC's Amazon Prime case under which Amazon will accelerate and expand redress payments under the September 2025 $2.5 billion settlement, which resolved allegations that Amazon enrolled millions of consumers in Prime subscriptions without their consent and knowingly made cancellation difficult. More consumers now qualify for refunds, the maximum payment cap rises from $51 to $200, and all future payments will be distributed automatically starting October 1, 2026, with potential supplemental $149 payments by April 2027. Amazon has already issued more than $845 million in redress payments as of September 2026.
$225.0M
The FTC and the state of Washington filed a joint complaint and proposed stipulated order requiring Amway Corp. and two affiliates—World Wide Group, L.L.C. (WWG) and Leadership Team Development Inc. (LTD)—to pay a $225 million judgment, the largest monetary recovery ever obtained from an MLM in an FTC action, over allegations that they used deceptive earnings claims and unfair tactics to recruit Independent Business Owners. The complaint alleges the companies falsely promised substantial income and recruitment success, pressured IBOs to buy products they could not resell, and instructed IBOs to falsely report sales. Nearly all of the judgment will be used as redress for IBOs who lost money, and the proposed order imposes structural reforms including a 70% resale requirement, independent audits of sales records, and a ban on approved providers charging new IBOs for first-year training.
$100.0M
FleetCor Technologies Inc. (now Corpay Inc.) and its CEO Ronald Clarke agreed to pay $100 million to settle an FTC administrative action alleging the company charged small business customers hidden and unauthorized fees for fuel cards and misrepresented gas savings, fraud-control features, and fees. A federal district court granted the FTC summary judgment on all counts in 2023, and a federal appeals court upheld that judgment and the permanent injunction in 2026. The settlement funds will be used to provide redress to harmed business customers.
FTC staff published FAQs on price transparency to help the automobile industry comply with the FTC Act, reiterating that an advertised vehicle price must be the actual price any consumer can pay, excluding only government-required charges. The guidance follows warning letters the FTC sent to 97 auto dealership groups earlier in 2026 and signals continued litigation against dealers that advertise one price but charge more through undisclosed fees. No specific entity was charged and no penalty was imposed.