Court Rules

Western District of Texas Sealing & Redaction Procedures

27 rules from official source documents

5 of 27 checked against the court's document. Each rule says how far it was checked. A value with a question mark is not in the court's wording on its card.

Procedures for filing sealed or redacted documents, including required motions and formats. This page is scoped to Western District of Texas; use the court rules overview to switch categories without leaving this court.

Checked and corrected to match the court's document on Oct 4, 2026CRITICAL

Civil casesProposed or draft document; may not be in force

Any party may file materials containing confidential information under seal without a separate motion for leave.

Because parties in patent cases routinely file confidential information, this Order grants leave for any party to file materials containing confidential information under seal. Parties need not file a separate motion for leave.

Judge Alan D Albright

Checked and corrected to match the court's document on Oct 4, 2026CRITICAL

Civil casesProposed or draft document; may not be in force

A publicly available redacted version of a motion or pleading filed under seal is due within seven days, but redacted exhibit versions are not required.

The filing party shall file a publicly available, redacted version of any motion or pleading filed under seal within seven days. The parties need not file redacted versions of exhibits to such documents.

Judge Alan D Albright

Checked and corrected to match the court's document on Oct 4, 2026CRITICAL

Civil casesProposed or draft document; may not be in force

If either party files briefing under seal, the Court will enter a sealed order, and the movant must email a redacted public version to the law clerk for publication within seven days after entry.

The Court will enter a sealed order to resolve a motion if either party filed its briefing under seal. The movant shall email a redacted version of the Court’s sealed order for publication within seven days after the Court enters the sealed order. The movant shall email the redacted, public version to the Court’s law clerk (txwdml_lawclerks_wa_judgealbright@txwd.uscourts.gov).

Judge Alan D Albright

Checked and corrected to match the court's document on Oct 4, 2026WARNING

Civil casesProposed or draft document; may not be in force

Entirely nonconfidential exhibits should not be filed under seal.

Exhibits that are nonconfidential in their entirety should not be filed under seal at all.

Judge Alan D Albright

Checked and corrected to match the court's document on Oct 4, 2026WARNING

Civil casesProposed or draft document; may not be in force

Parties must coordinate on a publicly available version with targeted redactions of information any party deems confidential, label it “PUBLIC VERSION,” and coordination does not concede that the redacted information is confidential.

The parties shall coordinate to make sure that the publicly available version redacts information that any party deems confidential. Redactions should be targeted to redact only that information. The publicly available version shall be labeled “PUBLIC VERSION.” Cooperating to file the publicly available version shall not be deemed as agreeing that the redacted information is confidential.

Judge Alan D Albright

Machine summary. Not checked yet.CRITICAL?

The following personal data identifiers should be excluded from all pleadings filed with the court, including any exhibits thereto, whether filed electronically or in paper, unless otherwise ordered by the Court:2 a. Social Security numbers. If an individual's Social Security number must be included in a pleading, only the last four digits of that number should be used. b. Names of minor children. If the name of a minor child must be mentioned in a pleading, only the initials of that child should be used. c. Dates of birth. If an individual's date of birth must be included in a pleading, only the year should be used. d. Financial account numbers. If financial account numbers are required in any pleading, only the last four digits of these numbers should be used. e. Home Addresses (in criminal cases). If a home address must be included, only the city and state should be listed.

Summary: Parties must exclude or redact specified personal data identifiers from all pleadings (including exhibits, electronic or paper) unless ordered otherwise by the Court.

Chief Judge Alia Moses

Machine summary. Not checked yet.CRITICAL?

If a party needs to file a document containing the full and complete personal data identifiers listed above, that party may, a. file an un redacted version of the document under seal with the following heading "SEALED DOCUMENT PURSUANT TO E-GOVERNMENT ACT OF 2002"; or b. file a reference list under seal with the same heading as above. The reference list shall contain the complete personal data identifier(s) and the redacted identifier(s) used in its (their) place in the filing. All references in the case to the redacted identifiers included in the reference list will be construed to refer to the corresponding complete personal data identifier. The reference list must be filed under seal, and may be amended as of right. The unredacted version ofthe document or the reference list shall be retained by the court as part of the record. The reference list is intended to serve as a type of "key." For example, if an individual's full Social Security Number is 123-45-6789, the list would include the complete number with the corresponding partially redacted number of XXX-XX-6789, which would be used in future filings. This is beneficial to the court and the clerk's office because it eliminates the filing of two versions of a document--one unredacted (and automatically under seal) and one redacted. The listing can be filed in civil and criminal cases.

Summary: Parties may file unredacted documents or a reference list under seal with specified heading if full personal data identifiers are required; reference lists may be amended as of right and apply to civil and criminal cases.

Chief Judge Alia Moses

Machine summary. Not checked yet.CRITICAL?

In order to further comply with the Judicial Conference Policy, in addition to items listed in paragraphs a. through e., the clerk's office shall not, absent an order of the court, provide public access (electronically or at the courthouse) to records determined by the Judicial Conference to be "Non-Public" (e.g., unexecuted criminal summonses and warrants of any kind; documents containing identifying information about jurors or potential jurors; juvenile records; financial affidavits; etc.), as well as sealed documents.

Summary: Clerk's office shall not provide public access to Non-Public records or sealed documents absent a court order.

Chief Judge Alia Moses

Not confirmed. Read the court's wording below.CRITICAL?

The Clerk's office will make a sealed informational docket entry in the Court's electronic filing system indicating that the HSD was filed with the Court and will maintain the HSD in a secure paper filing system or a secure standalone computer system that is not connected to any network.

Summary: The Clerk's office will make a sealed informational docket entry and maintain the HSD in a secure paper filing system or an unnetworked standalone computer system.

Chief Judge Alia Moses

Machine summary. Not checked yet.CRITICAL?

If a party moves to seal any materials in the appendix, it must divide the appendix into a public volume and a sealed volume. i. The public volume, which must contain all materials that the party is not authorized to file under seal and does not move to file under seal, must be paginated using App.___ pagination, and must otherwise comply with this order in full. ii. The sealed volume, labeled as such, must contain all materials that the party is authorized to file under seal or seeks to file under seal, and must otherwise comply with this order except that each page must be numbered sequentially beginning "Sealed.App.1" and each citation must be to "Sealed.App.__." iii. Table of contents in each volume. The table of contents in each volume must list every item in the entire appendix, identifying public items by their App.__ page and sealed items by their Sealed.App.__ page. In the public volume's table of contents, if identifying a sealed item by the content of the document would itself reveal information that should be sealed, the party may describe the item generically or, if necessary, note that the description is omitted.

Summary: When moving to seal appendix materials, divide into public and sealed volumes with separate pagination and table of contents requirements.

Judge Andrew B. Davis

Machine summary. Not checked yet.CRITICAL?

Discovery may not be withheld on the basis of confidentiality absent a Court order.

Summary: Discovery cannot be withheld for confidentiality without court order.

Judge Kathleen Cardone

Machine summary. Not checked yet.CRITICAL?

Because the Court finds that any patent case is likely to involve production of confidential, sensitive, or private information for which special protection from public disclosure and from use for any purpose other than prosecuting this litigation would be warranted, the Confidentiality and Protective Order available as Appendix H-1 to the Local Rules of the United States District

Summary: Patent cases presumptively require protective order for confidential information.

Judge Kathleen Cardone

Machine summary. Not checked yet.CRITICAL?

Civil cases

Counsel are reminded that, with regard to any paper that is filed, compliance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 5.2 is mandatory. Accordingly, counsel should ensure that appropriate redactions are made.

Summary: Compliance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 5.2 regarding redaction of certain material is mandatory.

Judge Xavier Rodriguez

Machine summary. Not checked yet.CRITICAL?

Civil cases

14. Requirement to confer before requesting sealing. The parties are required to meet and confer prior to filing a motion to seal documents. All motions to seal information that has been designated as confidential, whether by a party or non-party to the action, must include language certifying that the meet and confer requirement has been met.

Summary: Parties must meet and confer before filing a motion to seal; motion must certify compliance.

Magistrate Judge Dan MacLemore

Machine summary. Not checked yet.CRITICAL?

Civil cases

The filing party shall file a publicly available, redacted version of any motion or pleading filed under seal within seven days.

Summary: Redacted public version required within 7 days for sealed motions/pleadings

Magistrate Judge Derek Gilliland

Machine summary. Not checked yet.CRITICAL?

Civil cases

The movant shall email a redacted version of the Court's sealed order for publication within seven days after the Court enters the sealed order.

Summary: Redacted version of sealed orders must be emailed within 7 days

Magistrate Judge Derek Gilliland

Machine summary. Not checked yet.CRITICAL?

Civil cases

The parties shall coordinate to make sure that the publicly available version redacts information that any party deems confidential.

Summary: Parties must coordinate on redactions for publicly available versions

Magistrate Judge Derek Gilliland

Machine summary. Not checked yet.CRITICAL?

Civil cases

The publicly available version shall be labeled 'PUBLIC VERSION.'

Summary: Publicly available versions must be labeled 'PUBLIC VERSION'

Magistrate Judge Derek Gilliland

Machine summary. Not checked yet.WARNING?

In addition, parties should exercise caution when filing documents that contain the following: 1. any personal identifying number, such as driver's license number; 2. medical records, treatment and diagnosis; 3. employment history; 4. individual financial information; 5. proprietary or trade secret information; 6. information regarding an individual's cooperation with the government; 7. information regarding the victim of any criminal activity; 8. national security information; and 9. sensitive security information as described in 49 U.S.c. Sec. 114(s).

Summary: Parties should exercise caution when filing documents containing sensitive information including driver's license numbers, medical records, trade secrets, and national security information.

Chief Judge Alia Moses

Machine summary. Not checked yet.WARNING?

The Office of the Clerk will not review filings for compliance with this rule requiring redaction of personal data identifiers. Counsel is strongly urged to share this notice and privacy policy with all clients so that an informed decision about the inclusion of certain materials may be made. If a redacted document is filed, it is the sole responsibility of counsel and the parties to ensure that all documents and pleadings comply with the rules of this court requiring redaction of personal data identifiers.

Summary: Clerk's office will not review filings for redaction compliance; counsel and parties are solely responsible for compliance.

Chief Judge Alia Moses

Machine summary. Not checked yet.WARNING?

Civil cases

The Court disfavors motions to maintain filings under seal, and the Court expects parties to draft such submissions in a manner that does not disclose confidential information. W.D. Tex. Civ. R. 5.2(b). Proper redaction is preferable to sealing a case or a particular filing. Even when filing a document under seal may be warranted, it is better for the sealed document to be an exhibit rather than the entire filing. If a party wishes to file a pleading, motion, or exhibit under seal, the party must first obtain leave of court by motion with citation to authority supporting the filing under seal. The item will be admitted under seal if the Court deems such filing to be necessary.

Summary: Sealing discouraged; redaction preferred; leave of court required for sealed filings.

Judge Fred Biery

Machine summary. Not checked yet.WARNING?

Civil cases

The Court disfavors motions to maintain filings under seal, and the Court expects parties to draft such submissions in a manner that does not disclose confidential information. W.D. Tex. Civ. R. 5.2(b). Proper redaction is preferable to sealing a case or a particular filing. Even when filing a document under seal may be warranted, it is better for the sealed document to be an exhibit rather than the entire filing. If a party wishes to file a pleading, motion, or exhibit under seal, the party must first obtain leave of court by motion with citation to authority supporting the filing under seal. The item will be admitted under seal if the court deems such filing to be necessary.

Summary: Sealing filings is disfavored; redaction preferred; court approval required for sealing.

Judge Jason Pulliam

Machine summary. Not checked yet.WARNING?

Civil cases

Generally, the Court disfavors motions to maintain filings under seal and expects parties to draft such submissions in a manner that does not disclose confidential information. W.D. Tex. R. CV-5.2(b). Redaction is preferable to sealing a case or a particular filing. Even when filing a document under seal may be warranted, it is better for the sealed document to be an exhibit rather than the entire filing. If a party wishes to file a pleading, motion, or exhibit under seal, the party must first obtain leave of court by motion with citations to authority in support of filing under seal. The item will be admitted under seal if the court deems such filing to be necessary.

Summary: Sealing requires motion with authority; redaction preferred over sealing.

Judge Orlando L. Garcia

Machine summary. Not checked yet.WARNING?

Civil cases

Exhibits that are nonconfidential in their entirety should not be filed under seal at all.

Summary: Non-confidential exhibits should not be filed under seal

Magistrate Judge Derek Gilliland

Machine summary. Not checked yet.WARNING?

Civil cases

Redactions should be targeted to redact only that information.

Summary: Redactions must be narrowly targeted to confidential information only

Magistrate Judge Derek Gilliland

Machine summary. Not checked yet.INFO?

Civil cases

The parties need not file redacted versions of exhibits to such documents.

Summary: Redacted versions not required for exhibits to sealed documents

Magistrate Judge Derek Gilliland

Machine summary. Not checked yet.INFO?

Civil cases

Cooperating to file the publicly available version shall not be deemed as agreeing that the redacted information is confidential.

Summary: Cooperation on redactions does not constitute agreement on confidentiality

Magistrate Judge Derek Gilliland
Common questions about Western District of Texas sealing & redaction procedures

How does Western District of Texas handle sealed or redacted filings?

Magistrate Judge Derek Gilliland: The rule does not state that a motion to seal is required for the covered filing process. Process: file redacted on ecf. Redacted public version required within 7 days for sealed motions/pleadings Machine summary, not yet verified; check the linked order.

View ruleOfficial source Source: page 1, section STANDING ORDER REGARDING FILING DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL AND REDACTED PUBLIC VERSIONS

Chief Judge Alia Moses's rules set procedures for sealed or redacted filings. Process: file redacted on ecf and file unredacted to clerk. Parties must exclude or redact specified personal data identifiers from all pleadings (including exhibits, electronic or paper) unless ordered otherwise by the Court. Machine summary, not yet verified; check the linked order.

View ruleOfficial source Source: page 1, section I

A motion to seal is required for covered sealed filings before Magistrate Judge Dan MacLemore. Parties must meet and confer before filing a motion to seal; motion must certify compliance. Machine summary, not yet verified; check the linked order.

View ruleOfficial source Source: page 2, section Requirement to confer before requesting sealing.

19 more rules answer this question in the list above.